pj norton
Member
Has anyone picked this up for it's ASL content?
Yes.Has anyone picked this up for it's ASL content?
RB article is 8 pages, mostly text, though some illustrations and one most-of-a-page "tips" insetHow many pages is the RB CG article? And what is the locations of the two ASL scenarios? pjn
Abolutely true. Dangit.No. Just not enough ASL content to justify the expense.
Ooh! Ooh! I do! I do! Pick me!Who wants to lose based on a single dr?
The Russians can get enough troops across to before the bridge blows to get the job done.I thought that the RB CG article was very good, even though I don't play CGs. O15 looks okay. O16 is too game-y. The bulk of the Russians have to cross a bridge, which will blow up at some point based on a dr. Who wants to lose based on a single dr?
Not enough T-34/85s in the SK counter mix. Necessity is the Mother of Invention.The two SK scenarios look interesting, and look like they would be good even if played using "real" ASL rules. One does have this weird SSR that destroyed T34s come back as reinforcements the next turn - kinda like Zombie Tanks From Beyond The Grave. And there is no limit as to the number of times this can happen, so you just keep throwing them into the fray and watch the burning wrecks pile up. As Stalin said, "Quantity has a quality all its own."
The Russians can get enough troops across to before the bridge blows to get the job done.
And they better.
Not enough T-34/85s in the SK counter mix. Necessity is the Mother of Invention.