I don’t normally comment as the people on here are far more experienced than me , however, I see this as follows:
- index states that a hex is “the area inside the six hex sides which comprise a hex, including those hex sides and their vertices.
- rule A8.15 - ‘may claim a snapshot of it can trace LOS to the entire hexside that was crossed by the moving unit in entering an on-board hex.
- my understanding is that a line of site In building is always allowed to an adjacent hex bar think black rowhouse or factory walls etc and given point 1) above the hexside is part of the hex thus the hexside can be seen. However, it is also part of the entered hex Which is not adjacent and thus can’t be seen????
from my mind the hexside is actually in a parallel universe - it is both, at the same time part of two hexes the hex being left and the hex being entered!!! and there is no distinction between the two.
2) above indicates entering the hex- again this seems ambiguous as the hexside being crossed is in two states that of the hexside being exited and at the same time part of that being entered, one can be seen one can’t.
I think we would play this as you could not snapshot as it states that it is hexside of the hex being entered not that of the one being left.
This all seems very surreal!!!