Since wholesale copying did not occur, this would not be a problem.
And if it were a problem, it would be MMP's problem, not Pete's.
It is so refreshing how many people ignore the emoji placement in order to misunderstand facetiousness targeted at Mark Pitcavage and his treatment of Paul Kenney in quite similar circumstances. Since more formal of an approach seems to be desirable to yourself, and JR it appears as well, so be it, I will clarify:
Mark Pitcavage took Paul Kenney to task in no uncertain, and blazingly uncouth language, both here on Gamesquad, on CWS, and in his DM website webpages, for what Mark perceived as plagiarizing "Wikipedia" entries in order to create the Introductions to scenarios he designed (and published for sale, to be fair). Since Mark is such a huge pompous ass about his own opinions, it is only fair that "what is good for the goose, is good for the gander..." I have not yet seen him take either MMP or Pete to task for such a similarity of circumstances, much less with his typical "gutter" language he prefers to use to do so in such circumstances.
Hopefully, now that all attempts at levity have been removed from the situation, MMP, Perry, and JR will all understand there is a large difference between facetious comments directed at Mark Pitcavage and his pompousness, and any direct or indirect verbal animosity I (did not) direct at MMP or Pete.
KRL, Jon H