apbills
Elder Member
No, I just don't ignore the part of .14 that specifically calls out you must fulfill the requirements of .11. That is what is being ignored, nothing else. With the wording of .14, .11 is a part of the rule, and .11 must be fulfilled."In a hex of the building" vs "of a hex of the building" are equal. You are either in one of the building hexes or you're not. The upper level rubble location is still in a hex of the building, isn't it? Nothing in this rule is location based, merely being present at some level of the building hexes.
You have proven my point. Everything in your logic is based on HEX. HEX makes no difference at all. You are either in the building or you are not. We know for a fact that if you are in a building, you are in a building hex. We also know for a fact that you can be in a building hex without being in a building.
Two sentence or single sentence doesn't make a difference. An English teacher of mine once said I used too many semicolons when periods worked just as well. Sometimes it seems like the rules are the same way. The .14 rule doesn't exist just to tell you that you don't have to enter all locations/hexes of the building. It also tells you how to take control of a building, much like the specifics for a hex are detailed in .13.
Otherwise, if .14 isn't the authority on occupying a building for control purposes, what rule paragraph is, and what is the definition of occupation for building control purposes? Building locations or building hexes, or just plain buildings? Rooftops wouldn't be excluded because .11 was met, so you can ignore the part of .14 that says non-rooftop, right?
Like I said, we continue to talk past each other. I have not ignored any part of any rule. You admit that you ignore part of A26.14, specifially the part that states you must fulfill A26.11.