Nineteen Kilo
Senior Member
Black Cloud has touched on something that I find rather odd, the very poster who is advocating CG's in this thread is bashing any ahistorical scenarios in one or two other threads currently.Coming in very late to this discussion and I have not read all the posts.. don't have time.
But, re:
This is a part of the Campaign Game I find very unrealistic. Commanders at this level get units assigned to them; they have to perform the mission with why they got and are given by higher HQ. The can request suplemental forces but that does not mean they are granted. More often than not commanders are faced with inadequate forces to accomplish their tasks. Campaign Games don't reflect this.
It could be said that CGs are ahistorical by nature. Were the Germans idle on a certain day? Did the Soviets launch a night attack that day? Were any airstrikes conducted on a certain day? Was a company of tanks committed to the battle on a certain day? The answers in a CG could easily be Yes, Yes, Yes & Yes, but the reality might easily have been No, No, No & No.
BTW I'm not against ahistorical scenarios in any way, I've probably played Hill 621 as much or more than any other scenario.
Kev