Official Manila errata, aka The Manila Envelope

[Perry]

The second sentence of SF10 should read: “Mortars and AA Guns with an M# ≥10 may set up in a rooftop Location.”

The missing seventh line of the Intro to SF25 A Change In Goverment reads “followed by point blank fire from tanks, tank destroyers, and self-propelled mortars”.

 

[Perry]

Add the following to SF SSRs SF11:
"Every SMC stacked with a Commando MMC has scaling abilities, and every SMC generated by a Commando (in RePh purchase, or via Leader Generation or HOB) is a Commando."

 

[Perry]

In scenario SF5 No Safe Refuge, in SSR 3, for dr 5 replace the ATR with an LMG.

 

[Perry]

In scenario SF17 Assault Across The Pasig, all 6-6-7s should be 6-6-6s.

 

[Old Noob]

Could you put all the generated Sword & Fire errata in the 'Rules and Errata' section of Gamesquad, please?
It's currently scattered in at least two sections [at least].

 

[Perry]

The errata is all in this folder.
I’ll leave it to Admins on proper placement.

 

[Robin Reeve]

Moved to the Rules & errata folder.

 

[Old Noob]

Thank you.

 

[Larry]

Moved to the Rules & errata folder.

The forum should call that the ... Manila Folder ...

 

[Tuomo]

The forum should call that the ... Manila Folder ...

MODERATOR!!!!!!

 

[Porsche]

HAHAHA!

 

[ScottRomanowski]

The second sentence of SF10 should read: “Mortars and AA Guns with an M# ≥10 may set up in a rooftop Location.”

That is 1. SF Scenario Special Rules SF10, not scenario SF10.

 

[von Garvin]

MODERATOR!!!!!!

I'll allow it

 

[ASLSARGE]

Scenario SF9 First Do No Harm.....in the Victory Conditions it lists "33W77". Should read "3W77".
Also, in SSR 1 add the word "hexes" in between "of" and "3K64", so no one thinks it means placing blazes in all locations of those buildings.

 

[Perry]

Errata file posted on our website:
https://mmpgamers.com/support/asl/Manila_Errata_v2.pdf

 

[JR Brackin]

This question is regarding SF 5 Fortifications. Are Shellholes considered Open Ground for Japanese fortification not being HIP.

Based on the ASLRB OG definition OG is based on where the -1 FFMO could apply - Shellholes get the -1 FFMO when a unit uses 1 MP to enter the hex (OG), but if using 2 MP to enter than the -1 FFMO does not apply.

I checked Klas errata and could not find anything clear on this subject. Please enlighten me - thank you!

 

[ASLSARGE]

This question is regarding SF 5 Fortifications. Are Shellholes considered Open Ground for Japanese fortification not being HIP.

Based on the ASLRB OG definition OG is based on where the -1 FFMO could apply - Shellholes get the -1 FFMO when a unit uses 1 MP to enter the hex (OG), but if using 2 MP to enter than the -1 FFMO does not apply.

I checked Klas errata and could not find anything clear on this subject. Please enlighten me - thank you!

In short, in SF:M, shellholes are treated as Open Ground for Japanese Fortification placement. See footnote #3 and SF5. You could make a point for either case using the standard ASLRB, but this is how it was designed and intended for SF:M. Most Japanese fortifications were known well ahead of time by the Americans due to excellent intel from Filipino informants and aerial recon.

 

[JR Brackin]

A friend of mine noted that Perry answered this question under the MMP ares - thread Manilla Questions - post 165. He answered for this they were not OG.

Please discuss with Perry so that everyone is in agreement.

thank you,

 

[klasmalmstrom]

Please discuss with Perry so that everyone is in agreement.

You could drop MMP a Q&A on the matter.

 

[JR Brackin]

Will do