Soviet RPG-2 Korean deployment?

Brian W

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
7,183
Reaction score
1,158
Location
USA
Country
llUnited States
The RPG-2 went into production in 1948-49; were any given to the North Koreans or the Chinese in time for deployment in the KW?

I found an old scenario that gave the NK's the ability. The SSR treated them like a 44 PF, with a 23 TK, or enough to have a good chance of penetrating the front of a M26 or M46
 

Paul M. Weir

Forum Guru
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,321
Reaction score
3,284
Location
Dublin
First name
Paul
Country
llIreland
180mm of penetration would earn a TK of 23 (18+5), at least, though due to the exponential stepping/inflation of ASL's armour values, an extra point or two would not go amiss, so 23 -> 25 would do. I've seen both 180mm and 200mm penetration figures, so TK 23 or 25.

I've seen 100, 150 and 200m (~500m maximum, self-distruct) effective ranges and it was reloadable. An RPG-2 (and later RPG-7) had a 2 man team, a gunner with the RPG-2, a haversack with 3 rounds and an assistant with a haversack or sometimes two. While the firing cycle was closer to the various PF (IE more like a RCL than a Baz), it was not a "round of ammo" type like the PF or later LAW. So I suggest that the RPG-2 should be a 1PP SW with a TH table, using the Baz44 or Baz45 TH table and an IFT equivalent of 12. It had a 82mm diameter warhead which is far closer to the M20 (Baz50) calibre of 90mm than the M1/M9 (Baz43-45) 60mm, so copy the M20's 12 IFT rather than the other Baz's 8. An X11? While most factors are fairly straight forward, range and TH are a bit harder to pin down. As this is a more leisurely post war development, I would be inclined to give the RPG-2 the benefit of the doubt and use the Baz45/50 TH table rather than the Baz44 table.

I've seen no mention of it's use in the KW, which doesn't mean it wasn't, but if you did want it then maybe require a crew for such a new weapon? Maybe a few of the earlier and less successful RPG-1 were used?
 
Top