witchbottles
Forum Guru
Its no secret that Gen Paulus asked Hitler for permission to disengage and withdraw from Stalingrad only 8 days before Uranus kicked off, 12 days before he was surrounded and cut off.
By all accounts, the remnants of 6th Army were in no position to disengage at that time at all. I do not believe there was a capability to save more than a small fraction of the Wehrmacht troops in the city by that time. Hitler's replay to continue the assault was likely the correct response to Paulus and his retreat request. Trying to disengage would have destroyed his army anyway at that time, and resulted in the survivors surrendering when cut off from further retreat.
So when was the opportune moment for the Wehrmacht to pull back if they intended to save most of 6th Army?
I would hazard a guess that a dug in line from Kuibyshev Sawmill to the Mamayev Kurgan to Rynok was the main line of resistance the Germans should have tried to hold. Recall that Paulus had a single mission, to screen the flanks of 4th Pz Armee and Army Group B as they advanced towards the south. Paulus was ordered to do this by holding a line from the Don bend to the Volga.
German attempts to push farther than the line I gave above were a mistake, and an irreversible one. Once committed beyond those points, Wehrmacht troops were in a "do or die" situation - something they were not prepared for, nor assigned as a mission.
Yes, Hitler had ordered the seizure of Stalingrad in September. But that was not 6th Army's mission as assigned by Fall Blau.
I'm not saying Hitler was correct in attacking at all in 1942, he likely would have been better served to hold a strong defensive line backed by mobile tank brigades. But by November 10th, the writing was on the wall that 6th Army had been sacrificed anyway. So ordering them to hold and continue the assault was, in my narrow view, a correct decision.
thoughts?
By all accounts, the remnants of 6th Army were in no position to disengage at that time at all. I do not believe there was a capability to save more than a small fraction of the Wehrmacht troops in the city by that time. Hitler's replay to continue the assault was likely the correct response to Paulus and his retreat request. Trying to disengage would have destroyed his army anyway at that time, and resulted in the survivors surrendering when cut off from further retreat.
So when was the opportune moment for the Wehrmacht to pull back if they intended to save most of 6th Army?
I would hazard a guess that a dug in line from Kuibyshev Sawmill to the Mamayev Kurgan to Rynok was the main line of resistance the Germans should have tried to hold. Recall that Paulus had a single mission, to screen the flanks of 4th Pz Armee and Army Group B as they advanced towards the south. Paulus was ordered to do this by holding a line from the Don bend to the Volga.
German attempts to push farther than the line I gave above were a mistake, and an irreversible one. Once committed beyond those points, Wehrmacht troops were in a "do or die" situation - something they were not prepared for, nor assigned as a mission.
Yes, Hitler had ordered the seizure of Stalingrad in September. But that was not 6th Army's mission as assigned by Fall Blau.
I'm not saying Hitler was correct in attacking at all in 1942, he likely would have been better served to hold a strong defensive line backed by mobile tank brigades. But by November 10th, the writing was on the wall that 6th Army had been sacrificed anyway. So ordering them to hold and continue the assault was, in my narrow view, a correct decision.
thoughts?