hmm. This is a Game in serious need of version control.I don't think your charts are wrong as the only other place I found the annotation was on the Ole Boe charts. However, one could arrive at the same conclusion by reading C5.2 as an AAMG has no CA restrictions (normally).
NOTE: There have been a few clarifications and errata to certain publications of the charts but these are noted on the MMP site and if you have the BV3 edition those should be the most current.
You're more than likely correct that BV3 did not include charts, just couldn't remember. When I was deployed we had a home fire and destroyed my other charts (or smoke damaged them anyway) and I had to reorder them, just forgot that I had ordered them separately. IIRC you are also right that some newer ones came with HP (got a good memory, just darn short). Either way I still like the Ole Boe charts as there are/were some special extras that he included in his charts that were fairly handy for reference.hmm. This is a Game in serious need of version control.
BV3 had no charts (leastwise, my second copy of BV, which I think is version 3, as opposed to version 1, which I know was the original, had no charts). So the current dividers are from the Rulebook, 2d Ed., except where replaced by HP! (that "!" is not intended grammatically).
HP! replaced QRDC, B, D, E and the Nat'l Capabilities Chart/OBA Flowchart but not, among others, C. So we have the anomaly of Table C5 on the QDRC reflecting the Errata on the MMP site but not OB's refinements, and Table C5 on the C Divider not reflecting either.
I guess I need to just get back to playing the game and forget about whether I have the right rule set of the game.
hmm. This is a Game in serious need of version control.
BV3 had no charts (leastwise, my second copy of BV, which I think is version 3, as opposed to version 1, which I know was the original, had no charts). So the current dividers are from the Rulebook, 2d Ed., except where replaced by HP! (that "!" is not intended grammatically).
HP! replaced QRDC, B, D, E and the Nat'l Capabilities Chart/OBA Flowchart but not, among others, C. So we have the anomaly of Table C5 on the QDRC reflecting the Errata on the MMP site but not OB's refinements, and Table C5 on the C Divider not reflecting either.
I guess I need to just get back to playing the game and forget about whether I have the right rule set of the game.
Same here. The Ole Boe chart is the best two page play-aid that is out there with regard to overall usefulness IMHO.Either way I still like the Ole Boe charts as there are/were some special extras that he included in his charts that were fairly handy for reference.
Figured about the Korea special stuff but was unaware the 114 HEAT was not included (but I guess I should have been as it was probably only a Finnish deal?).Same here. The Ole Boe chart is the best two page play-aid that is out there with regard to overall usefulness IMHO.
Here is a link for download for those interested:
IIFT(M)QRDC v3.6 by Ole Boe
Ole Boe's Incremental IFT (Mini) Quick Reference Data Card v3.6 b/w. You might either love or hate the IIFT - whatever. This is the play-aid I use in EVERY game of ASL (be it using IFT or IIFT).www.gamesquad.com
By now it could use a minor update as some things are missing by now (the 114 HEAT round for example and Korea stuff).
von Marwitz
Ole Boe seems to have withdrawn from the hobby - or at least the public part of it - long ago. Thus his lastest version v3.6 of his fine play-aid dates from before the release of the HP and Korea core-modules, which are thus not taken into account.Figured about the Korea special stuff but was unaware the 114 HEAT was not included (but I guess I should have been as it was probably only a Finnish deal?).
I am willing to give it a try, but I own neither HP nor Korea. What exactly should be changed/added? Is there a leader to direct me?Ole Boe seems to have withdrawn from the hobby - or at least the public part of it - long ago. Thus his lastest version v3.6 of his fine play-aid dates from before the release of the HP and Korea core-modules, which are thus not taken into account.
Probably it would not be too much work to update his v3.6 to include the changes provided one would have software at hand that would allow for the editing of the available PDF.
That one is lacking the IIFT with CTC, which was part of all of Ole Boe's versions.
What's CTC? I might update the IIFT version, too.That one is lacking the IIFT with CTC, which was part of all of Ole Boe's versions.
No idea. I just implemented the changes fenyan suggested.What is "PO"?
Conditional Task Check on the IIFT, which only applies on unconcealed targets.What's CTC? I might update the IIFT version, too.
Anyone concerned about concealment being stripped away too easily can adopt the "conditional" PTC as a house rule.
Conditional Task Check just as Swiftandsure explained. Ole Boe's v3.6 with the IIFT+CTC can be found here:What's CTC? I might update the IIFT version, too.
PO is a Political Officer--W7.31: CPVA treat Political Officers (PO) as Commissars just as if they were 10/42 Russians (A25.22-.223) unless specified otherwise. Political Officers have a red Strength Factor (A10.7). A unit is not immune to DM status while being rallied by a PO, but the DRM is +2 instead of the normal +4 (A10.62), and a unit which fails to rally under the direction of a PO is not Replaced/Casualty-Reduced/eliminated per A25.222. No leader may be exchanged for a PO, which must be specifically assigned in the OB."Treat as Berserk if: Japanese, Gurhka, Partisan, Fanatic, Commisar, SS vs Russians or subject to No Quarter (A15.5), Early KE ROK, CPVA not ADJACENT to Good Order UN Infantry unit (W7.9), PO "
What is "PO"?