VASL Polish wz. 34 II armored car error

[Robin Reeve]

Hi,
Contrary to the physical counter, the Polish wz. 34 II armored car has a 4 FP CMG.

Cheers
Robin

 

[Stewart]

So the RB is in error? or Vasl?

 

[Hutch]

The eASLRB does not show a CMG.

 

[Hutch]

Nor listed is Scott's latest errata v26 21 May 2023

 

[Robin Reeve]

So the RB is in error? or Vasl?

The BFP expansion is in error.
The VASL "MMP" counter is correct.

The BFP notes - which sometimes differ from Chapter H - don't have one for that vehicle.

 

[Philippe D.]

Robin, I think part of the confusion is that your initial post did not reference VASL at all - while, from the context and your second post, I understand that it's about the VASL counter.

 

[Robin Reeve]

Robin, I think part of the confusion is that your initial post did not reference VASL at all - while, from the context and your second post, I understand that it's about the VASL counter.

See the title of the thread.
How would you understand "Contrary to the physical counter..." otherwise than referring to VASL?
The image also is from VASL.

 

[Philippe D.]

Duh! Missed the thread title.

But "contrary to the physical counter" could refer to the vehicle notes in the BFP rules, though.

 

[Robin Reeve]

I could have been more explicit.

 

[Eagle4ty]

I could have been more explicit.

Bigger font in the thread title perhaps?

 

[Hutch]

Ok, this was my error. On reading the post I read it as the reverse, as in the physical counter was supposed to have 4 FP CMG.
That's why I posted the eASLRB picture. Sorry for the confusion.

 

[Robin Reeve]

Ok, this was my error. On reading the post I read it as the reverse, as in the physical counter was supposed to have 4 FP CMG.
That's why I posted the eASLRB picture. Sorry for the confusion.

No problem. I saw your post as a confirmation of what I had written.

 

[Hutch]

Trying to keep up with the Counter errata for the AH/MMP Armory, I look at any tidbits of information that people post and attempt to verify.