I agree mostly with what you said, Commander. I propose that sortie into I, with as much "noise" as we can, maybe we can influence the thinking of the govt commander. Securing C is OK, UN might have to move south then, that is our purpose, I believe. I prefer to leave that company in N, with passive engagement rules, just to block UN reinforcements from the south. They are mobile, and can go to G quicker than normal. Also, it would tie down that govt unit there.
I do not think govt would attack us in G, even if they are concentrated. If I were in their boots, I would make a raid on G, just to ensure that we make no points by possessing it. With the rest of my forces I would move to J and T, so this way I would have two secure bases, while we have one, A, G being constantly attacked, no matter how small those forces would be. This way in 3-4 turns they would get the upper hand. So this is why I propose to move to I. Thinking again, I still propose to move with more than one company... I think we should have 2-3 there, with the right orders they could prevent govt forces bypassing to J, and when we see their movement we could reinforce either I or G from the other zone. So I think giving I an adequate force would enhance our options and our manouverability on the strategic level. So I still asking for 2-3 coys to move with them to I.
K