GeorgeBates
Elder Member
My opponent and I uncovered a few ambiguities that Perry promptly cleared up.
Cheers!
- G
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSR 1:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 03:19:37 +0000 (UTC), Perry wrote:
> Is a different SSR intended?
No.
....Perry
MMP
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 9:03 AM
To: asl_qa@multimanpublishing.com
Subject: BRT5 "Hell Wouldn't Have It"
SSR 1 says "first sentence of BRT7 is NA". BRT7 only has one sentence. Is
a different SSR intended?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSR 2:
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 11:20 AM
The rules reference should be to E1.2.
....Perry
MMP
________________________________________
We also noted that last sentence of SSR2 reads:
"Despite not being Scenario Defender, Marine SMC/SW may still set up HIP per E1.12."
Cheers!
- G
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSR 1:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 03:19:37 +0000 (UTC), Perry wrote:
> Is a different SSR intended?
No.
....Perry
MMP
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 9:03 AM
To: asl_qa@multimanpublishing.com
Subject: BRT5 "Hell Wouldn't Have It"
SSR 1 says "first sentence of BRT7 is NA". BRT7 only has one sentence. Is
a different SSR intended?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSR 2:
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 11:20 AM
The rules reference should be to E1.2.
....Perry
MMP
________________________________________
We also noted that last sentence of SSR2 reads:
"Despite not being Scenario Defender, Marine SMC/SW may still set up HIP per E1.12."