Jeff Leslie
Member
Sheesh, somebody wants this thing bad...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=2558&item=3117372857&rd=1
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=2558&item=3117372857&rd=1
I actually disagree. Once you have the errata (and there is a lot of it) the '95 Annual is the best annual by far, unless you already have (from TT and others) the scenarios that were reprinted in it. There are some very good scenarios from the 95 annual. It is certainly better than two of the Journals as well, and maybe all four if you like PTO [EXC: Caves] like I do. For the few deluxe fans out there it is a necessity for the overlays, the last ditch effort to save the ill-conceived DASL idea.Matt Romey said:For that piece of cr*p? I boycotted it due to the incredible amount of errors. I have played some of the scenarios, but only from other peoples' ASL sets. Even with the errata sometimes it's hard to tell if you are playing it right.
Very true, and if you look at the picture it almost looks like the '95 annual is a photocopy since it looks black & white to me...The poor misguided soul who is bidding on this may be thinking he's getting all the stuff in the picture....
That's the protective cover/DASL overlay sheet.Very true, and if you look at the picture it almost looks like the '95 annual is a photocopy since it looks black & white to me...