One last attempt to attempt to illustrate my point, and then I'll simply presume no one is capable of grasping a subtle philosophical concept.
Phillip said that he believed Steve was living solely off of the income he receives from sales derived from Combat Mission/battlefront. I said he wasn't in a position to really know this.
Phillip counters by saying he knows Steve personally; works closely in a business relationship with him with friendly overtones.
I say that doesn't matter as far as knowing the real truth.
I can relate directly to Phillip's situation, incidentally.
I used to work in a firearms store. The owner of the shop sold German militaria as well. Many people in town called him, jocularly sometimes, other times disparagingly, "Nazi ____". It was a running joke in many circles. I had no reason to believe he really was a Nazi; if he was, I wouldn't have worked for him. I was surprised over the years at the number of people who simply presumed, because the stories were so pervasive, that he simply was. I certainly didn't want to believe it about him, so I remained convinced he wasn't. I saw no evidence of it, and I felt no need to go looking. I made some money part time and enjoyed my association with him.
The association ended on a sour note over a legal matter; it was at that point that the military police questioned me regarding my association with him and informed me that they had reason to believe he was a white supremacist. They showed me no evidence or grounds for their beliefs - I wouldn't have expected them to - but I quickly cleared my own name, they informed my CO that I had no ties to any groups of that nature (this was at the time of Somalia), advised me formally not to have any further contact with my former boss, and we went our separate ways.
My former boss is ironically enough now part of the Canadian Forces himself, commissioned into the cadet instructor cadre, teaching youth. Was he really involved in the right wing movement? I still have no idea. There are a couple of books written about the movement in which he is mentioned in passing. The rumours still persist regarding him.
My point? I worked with him for a long time but we never discussed that aspect of his background and there was sufficient doubt in my mind throughout our association as to what his real background was. There are even wilder stories than that. To this day, I hear stories that his business was really an "RCMP front" because there was no way he could possibly have survived on the business alone. The military community and associated hobbies seem to breed this kind of gossip.
In Steve's case, if he wasn't making enough money off of CM/BFC to live solely off of it, I think we can safely presume that would be an embarrassing situation that would be easily concealed from anyone, and also a natural instinct for anyone in that position. Certainly it would be consistent with the concealment of sales figures from the general public. It would be natural to keep his personal finances a closely guarded secret as well.
I don't understand the resistance to this line of discussion. It's certainly come up here before, in respect to dalem's prediction that BFC ceases to exist in the next few years. That's the whole driver of the prediction - how much money they take in. If Steve has a second income, or battlefront is just a basement hobby, BFC can conceivably go on forever.