That's right, zooks and flamethrowers can do ugly things to the kitties.The problem is that we are talking about an _armored_ joust. :devious: .ER_Chaser said:hehe.. my favorite weapon against Tiger ---- infantry!
Oh, armored joust means ... tank only games? Well, if really so, what kind of boring battles that will be?Artur said:That's right, zooks and flamethrowers can do ugly things to the kitties.The problem is that we are talking about an _armored_ joust. :devious: .
Artur.
Yeah, we need to see our opponents burning to death.ER_Chaser said:Oh, armored joust means ... tank only games? Well, if really so, what kind of boring battles that will be?
ER_Chaser said:Oh, armored joust means ... tank only games? Well, if really so, what kind of boring battles that will be?
NORAD said:Vulture we are a tad bit over 12. Is the team size set at 12, or will we be able to field 13 to get KG Panther into play?
Also we may get more. If we get 10 more players interested we might be able to do 2 teams of 12... What say you gentlemen? Any more takers?
Here is the list so far in the order that you posted on this thread. Please let me know ASAP if you can NOT play.
1) The Purist
2) Mephisto
3) Artur
4) Dr. Sinister
5) Redwolf
6) Boff
7) BigMik1
8) Scipio
9) JVS Fugitive
10) Osvold
11) Yohajin
12) GAZ NZ
13) KG Panther
14) NORAD
LoL ... Vulture, and Mike, I wasn't "personal" for sure .. Yet, I was serious ... Is it really tank only? i.e., every unit on map must be a tank or at least tracked fighting vehicles?Vulture(FGM) said:Hummmmmmmmmmmmmm
Such a boring concept that the 2nd tournament just finishing had 4 different clubs playing and a total of 84 players.
Vulture(FGM)
LoL ... I do not intend to call our "guest" boring ... honestly I did not even dream about a setup with tank only for tourney. Combined arms was the soul developed during WWII ---- a balance of forces proved to be superior than any monotonic array of weapons (be it tanks or cannons..). So I did think pure tank things were boring. Well, that is for me, I am not saying it is boring for others ...NORAD said:I know you weren't personal ER but calling our guests tournament boring is not exactly hospitible either . Guess you don't play Kursk scenarios too much in CMBB eh...considering your aversion to tank combat :laugh: :cheeky:
Just playing around...indeed ER it is Pure Armor.
Vulture I will get you the players email shortly.
The Purist said:Ok,...I've put forward my argument for late 1942. I leave it to the "Joust Master" to make the final decision.
Cheers.
ER_Chaser said:LoL ... I do not intend to call our "guest" boring ... honestly I did not even dream about a setup with tank only for tourney. Combined arms was the soul developed during WWII ---- a balance of forces proved to be superior than any monotonic array of weapons (be it tanks or cannons..). So I did think pure tank things were boring. Well, that is for me, I am not saying it is boring for others ...
Thanks buddy, for the nice explanation of the idea.Vulture(FGM) said:ER, the reason I decided to run it as pure armour was to give some light-hearted variation from the 'vanilla' combined arms tournaments. The concept is of course not up everyones street, but it allows players to use large scale armoured formations the mix of which is pretty much entirely up to them. For instance in the CMBB Joust one player took an entire Stug battalion. :laugh: (and did quite well from what I recall)
Anyway enough of my ramblings.........
Vulture
The Purist said:"a definate suggestion for the month in 1942 to go firm with."
Two things that might be worth considering:
1) 10/42 would allow the British purchase of Shermans, not available in 9/42, if I recall correctly. These can challenge the PzKw IVF2/G.
Wow! That is an extreme map! It looks like Tatooine...just needs a Jawa Sandcrawler to complete the picture.Vulture(FGM) said:Any feedback on the map guys ?