At the battle of Little Bighorn, many Souix were armed with winchesters, which were better than the breechloaders of the 7th cav. This causes me to ponder what sort of firearms the Indians in 18th century wars might have had. (It also causes me to want a Custer's Last Stand scenario...lol)
If hunting is a prime use for the weapon, might they not have gotten ahold of some rifles? Why would you hunt with a musket? Rifles were predominant on the frontier. The Indians must have captured some. Traders must have sold them some, too.
As I understand the N unit type for indians, they melee better in column. Would this apply no matter what weapon they are assigned?
As alot of indian battles are in forests, giving them rifles negates the range advantage of the weapon, and they all shouldnt be armed with them.
If hunting is a prime use for the weapon, might they not have gotten ahold of some rifles? Why would you hunt with a musket? Rifles were predominant on the frontier. The Indians must have captured some. Traders must have sold them some, too.
As I understand the N unit type for indians, they melee better in column. Would this apply no matter what weapon they are assigned?
As alot of indian battles are in forests, giving them rifles negates the range advantage of the weapon, and they all shouldnt be armed with them.