New Errata re: Journal 16

Status
Not open for further replies.

Perry

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
3,276
Location
Baltimore, MD
Country
llUnited States
After publishing errata in the Debriefing in ASL Journal 16, we realized that some of the newly erraticized rules needed further clarification, which we present below. (These should only be used after incorporating the errata in that J16 Debriefing.) Concurrently, we are posting on our website a revised ASLRB Errata file that includes these additions.
[Not sure where best on GS to post this. I am sure the trusted Moderators will move/duplicate where appropriate.]


New errata to add to that in the Debriefing in ASL Journal 16


A7.212 EX: Replace the last three sentences (starting with “If the squad were...”) with: “If the squad were in an upper-level Location of the hex, then it could attack outside its hex; it would still attack the PRC with TPBF, but now the Passengers could attack back (D6.61) although only with PBF (if within one level), not TPBF; if CE, the halftrack (and its Passengers) could also fire outside its hex.”.

A8.311: line 1, replace “eligible to use TPBF vs” with “whose Location is occupied by”.


B27.4: in the EXC at the end of the last sentence add “Snap-Shot/” prior to “Residual-FP/OBA” and at the end of the EXC add “normally”. At the end of the sentence after “Location” add “above the foxhole.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top