House rules

bendizoid

Official ***** Dickweed
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
5,045
Reaction score
4,110
Location
Viet Nam
Country
llUnited States
This is interesting.
I normally point out repairs/ rally's to my opponent; and yet, if it myself that forgets... I usually say " forget it, up to me to know what I should be repairing " etc. Yeah, stupid , I know!
I feel that in this game, it is learning to do repairs etc at the correct time and phase that makes one a better player.

just me and my rambling thoughts!
All valid points and I kinda feel the same way. It just seems to me it moves the game along quicker when you don’t have to look at every unit on every phase all the time. Besides these ‘units’ should have a certain autonomy, the battalion CO shouldn’t have to tell his guys to fix their stuff all the time.
 

von Marwitz

Forum Legend
Joined
Nov 25, 2010
Messages
16,267
Reaction score
13,708
Location
Kraut Corner
Country
llUkraine
I meant they will turn down the offer to repair their weapons or rally that squad out of turn.
I've encountered both:
  • Opponents denying the repair of a weapon, because it was past the point of the ASOP for that phase.
  • Opponents refusing to repair their weapon, even when prompted to do so, because it was past the point of the ASOP for that phase.
My consequence is that I run down the ASOP with my finger, which slows play... 🤷‍♂️

von Marwitz
 

Actionjick

Forum Guru
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
9,498
Reaction score
7,121
Location
Kent, Ohio
First name
Darryl
Country
llUnited States
I've encountered both:
  • Opponents denying the repair of a weapon, because it was past the point of the ASOP for that phase.
  • Opponents refusing to repair their weapon, even when prompted to do so, because it was past the point of the ASOP for that phase.
My consequence is that I run down the ASOP with my finger, which slows play... 🤷‍♂️

von Marwitz
Btw the solution to the ASL rebus is in your post.

Allowing do overs or I forgot is very situational.
 

gorkowskij

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
287
Reaction score
790
Country
llUnited States
I've encountered both:
  • Opponents denying the repair of a weapon, because it was past the point of the ASOP for that phase.
  • Opponents refusing to repair their weapon, even when prompted to do so, because it was past the point of the ASOP for that phase.
My consequence is that I run down the ASOP with my finger, which slows play... 🤷‍♂️

von Marwitz
Yet another good reason to adopt that house rule that shifts weapon repair from the rally phase to the fire phase, when you intend to use it. Thanks to the limits of human memory, this is often what happens in practice anyway. I have gladly allowed opponents to attempt repair out-of-sequence, indeed the practice is so widely used that across 10 tournaments I have never seen such a request denied, although I am sure that does happen.

In any case, fire phase repair attempts make more sense. The usual rally phase attempt reveals the fate of the weapon before the attacker has to make decisions about movement or fire. For example, "A ha! I see that you failed to repair your HMG in the rally phase, so I will now go ahead and move freely in your face." If, on the other hand, that attacker had to make the move decision first, and then the defender could, as part of defensive fire, make his repair attempt the game would benefit.

Anyway, I'm happy to stick with the SOP, but there is a really good case for amending the rules to shift repair attempts from rally to fire phases. And that case is so good that we often see players allowing it in practice, even if they don't label it a "house rule."
 
Top