Search results

Why Ole left the forum excactly? His chart is used by the whole world...

This is the year of the england.

Finally i received the pack from Le franc tireur with ItR, OC and BtB2.... i've read the article where chas explaine the rules for the bocage themed scenarios and finally i understand what he want say with the past reply. What i still don't understand is if there's historical evidence that...

Really? Dunno that as i play from 1,5 year.... but i'm sure that i could find some flame war topic in the forum about that. ;-)

I don't undestand your reply Chas... i'm not sayng that you're choice to allow SCW vs bocage is wrong. As new player and not an expert in history i'm only asking if this choise is historically allowed and because i think that's a big difference in the way a german play a bocage scenario if...

this mean that also german could use they're huge amount of panzerfaust vs infantry behind a bocage... that's an historical use of that weapon or some gamey use allowed by the rules? In some scenario like BtB6 - Man against tank, the german could use up to 10pf vs american infantry as no tank...

A question, why SSR 5 of the BtB 2 pack say that SCW could be used vs bocage, light bocage but the manual say that's not possible? some historical difference, point of view, or i miss some errata?

The german 838 reinforcement of turn 4 in BtB7 - Blood on Hill 192 are assault engineer or not? They're a pioneer battalion and have a flame thrower but no ssr say that they're assault engineer.