Which would you prefer MMP focus on--core, HASLs, or post-Korea?

[chris_olden]

‘45-‘64

 

[chris_olden]

No beyond Korea module interests me: there are better tactical systems covering later periods -

As long as WW2-Korean era weapons systems are being used by the combatants,
I’m good with seeing post-KW scenarios.

 

[Justiciar]

THE Bishop. That's my proper name. -- jim

 

[Mr Incredible]

Shrimp wraps are very popular around where I live as well.

 

[witchbottles]

easy to decide. without a steady supply of core modules and ASLRB's, the hobby dies.

 

[Paul M. Weir]

Though I have them all, keeping the WW2 cores in print or without too many years unavailable, I feel should be MMP's priority, nothing to do with what I might like.

Once that is done what I would like to see are (1) cores surrounding WW2, like FW, so SCW, 1st Indo-China, India-Pakistan, '48, '56 maybe even '67 AIW, etc, (2) AP's and WOs for maps and only then (3) HASL on less covered subjects with a moderate preference for smaller ones.

If you have the rules and toys you can make up your own sh ... stuff from histories. I call ASL a WW2 toybox and that is it's greatest strength.

 

[Will Fleming]

My take is MMP should follow their passion and work on things they are interested in. We will get better product that way.

That said, there has to be some emphasis on getting the core modules in print and available for people who need them.

All that said, I am a HASL whore. Give me historical maps to play on!

 

[Pieter76]

2-1-0 I have no interest in post ww2 stuff

 

[Brad M-V]

Maybe I'm being a little too selfish, but I'd prefer MMP to focus on ASL.

From my point of view you are only being a little selfish (like the rest of us), because I also buy MMP's Standard Combat Series, too. ;-)

 

[stuh42asl]

Put the finshing touches on the new Croix de Guerre updated module would be nice

 

[Mr Incredible]

I said post 53, only to the extent the ASL system can keep working.

 

[djohannsen]

I buy the HASL's but never play them and rarely punch out the counters. Most of mine are more or less new in shrink.

I'm glad that I'm not the only one.

 

['Ol Fezziwig]

Damn... This hoary olde chestnut? Just play if you can, hoard compulsively if you can't.

 

[kcole4001]

Personally, HASLs all the way, as I have all the core stuff, but there are many, many new players who don't, so:
Core modules are the only real first priority choice.
After that it's gravy.

 

[Yuri0352]

Good to see that one again! I forgot about the Firebird.

 

[Carln0130]

I'm looking forward to more Korea scenarios, but . . .

Is there a way to weight polls? I.e., I'd like people to be able to deploy a total of up to three points between the three options (as in, 3-0-0, or 2-1-0, or 1-1-1, etc.).

Damn... This hoary olde chestnut? Just play if you can, hoard compulsively if you can't.

Speaking of hoary old chestnuts...................you going to the Nor'easter, mystery guest?

 

[RobZagnut]

1. Half an AP and half a Journal dedicated to Korean War to move things along.

2. MMP will always publish core modules as they’re needed. But would like to see French, Italians, Desert next.

3. HASLs

 

[stuh42asl]

A desert re-write would also be great..................revamp the counters so us older fellas don't go blind reading them

 

[Sparafucil3]

A desert re-write would also be great..................revamp the counters so us older fellas don't go blind reading them

An official treatment of Ruweisat Ridge and for Sidi Rezegh. -- jim

 

[witchbottles]

a DTO revision from MMP would be printing a core module. French or Italian OOB from MMP would be printing a core module.