tommyl
Member
Those use Q not qKeep at word smithing.. QRDC, Quasi-Location, and QSU.
Those use Q not qKeep at word smithing.. QRDC, Quasi-Location, and QSU.
Not understanding. This is allowed, as long as the unit does not expend ≥ its Movement Allowance. Are you trying to say that placing a DC should not be concealment loss?allow units placing a DC to claim assault movement, this represents a small unit or SMC "creeping up" on the target as opposed to the Hollywood charge and throw method.
Except for the odd case of Spraying Fire (which does not happen very often), you still need a moving target to attack in order to place Residual FP in a Location. So I am not sure what you are referring to.units laying down fire just to put residual FP in a hex to deny entry should be TI, this reduces that sleaze tactic,
Nice rule change almost a no brainerIncremental CC results:
One squad-equivalent (RS applies) is killed per integer below the final Kill number. It would not make much of a difference in most cases, but would limit the carnage done by a lone Japanese SMC armed only with his sword.
Some may like it, but hey it's just Hollywood
I am not sure, but I think Japanese leaders had access to grenades too.Incremental CC results:
One squad-equivalent (RS applies) is killed per integer below the final Kill number. It would not make much of a difference in most cases, but would limit the carnage done by a lone Japanese SMC armed only with his sword.
Some may like it, but hey it's just Hollywood
Though what some might consider improvements, others might consider changes for the worse... we just deserve a serious rules improvement..
Ditto.At some point, some rules change just mean a different game. Any wargame has to be an abstraction, with some design decisions made. Change enough of them, even for "more realism", and you end up playing a completely different game.
You can play with whatever rules you can talk your opponent into playing with.We have been playing accordying to rules as written for years never thinking about the absurdity of a big lot of them.. at this point, with so many years playing and the fantastic level of researching about lot of battles, weapons, vehicles.. we just deserve a serious rules improvement..
Or just call them CG SSR and no convincing needed!...and convince someone else to play with your rulz changes.