I'm pretty sure that the 7.92 from an MG 34/42 was the same as fired from a mauser rifle. An AP round was available, so perhaps an MG 34/42 would have greater access to that round. In any case, I would not want to be sitting in that jeep when bullets started hitting it.I could see that stopping small arms fire ie rifle/pistol fire.
But 7.92 rounds ie from a MG 34/42? Heavens no...ATR rounds? No way....
Eek, that might not even stop M2 Ball from the Garand. M2 AP would go through it. Probably was intended to protect from frag.I could see that stopping small arms fire ie rifle/pistol fire.
You ever seen the size of the typical re-enactors they cart around in those jeeps 60 years after the fact at FIG? They can take it.Not to mention the added weight that little 4 popper would have to carry around.
Given the nicely sloped armor on the hull front--just like a Panther--I was going to suggest 18 circled. Starred side and rear, of course.Given that the MG42 rounds often penetrated the sides of the M£ halftrack, I recon we could argue for a 0 armour rating.
Hey I represent that remark.. I have an M38A1 torn apart in my garage which is a bit bigger than the WW2 Jeep. That armor might work in the Bulge on a road but across country in the summer It's not going far.You ever seen the size of the typical re-enactors they cart around in those jeeps 60 years after the fact at FIG? They can take it.
Another picture:
Removed the radio it could be good enough for the role of the classical "light" Italian armored vehicle. A bit too expansive perhaps.Another picture:
Button'd up! Road rate NANote that most of the time, the driver is looking just over the top of the armor. The vision slit would require him to be ducking down somewhat and hunching over the wheel.
Which, not coincidentally, is what he'd be doing when the vision slit was called for anyway...
John