Hmm, I pre-ordered on February 9th.I had pre-ordered SK4 from him and received it a week ago.
I find it's always easiest to give Derek a phone call (his number is on the Ritterkrieg website) if you have any questions. He'll get everything settled to your satisfaction right over the phone. Plus, he's always fun to chat with (super guy).Did anyone buy from RitterKrieg recently? I emailed him about SK4 pre-order status but got no response.
My preorder was March 20.Hmm, I pre-ordered on February 9th.
Leave the rares and protypes to World of Tanks.The point I made in the write-up of HP on my website re the German artillery piece was that MMP was now printing game pieces and Chapter H rules for mere prototypes and singleton AFVs while there are still major gaps in the OBs--with AFVs or weapons that numbered in the hundreds or even thousands that still were not represented in ASL even after more than 30 years. I think it is very reasonable to make sure all the major AFVs and Guns are represented in ASL before spending time and effort on prototype weapons that were never a factor on the battlefield.
I would love ??????? to see your list of AFV/Guns that need to be included!The point I made in the write-up of HP on my website re the German artillery piece was that MMP was now printing game pieces and Chapter H rules for mere prototypes and singleton AFVs while there are still major gaps in the OBs--with AFVs or weapons that numbered in the hundreds or even thousands that still were not represented in ASL even after more than 30 years. I think it is very reasonable to make sure all the major AFVs and Guns are represented in ASL before spending time and effort on prototype weapons that were never a factor on the battlefield.
Nonsense. We need the MMP Maus.I think it is very reasonable to make sure all the major AFVs and Guns are represented in ASL before spending time and effort on prototype weapons that were never a factor on the battlefield.
LolI would love ??????? to see your list of AFV/Guns that need to be included!
I have my reasons... ?
Pitman has a good point to which I agree.Nonsense. We need the MMP Maus.
JR
Oh FFS!!! NoPitman has a good point to which I agree.
Besides that:
Think BIG, JR - P.1000 "Ratte" counter now!
von Marwitz
Oh I gotsted more kit than you...and I have the IIFT memorized, something dinosaurs like myself can do, unlike you youngsters that need a screen of what ever type to find your way...paper trails help build memory skills, bits and bites do not...Enh...wanna buy my collection?
I'll make you a sweetheart deal because you're you and because you'll enjoy the defaced IIFTs.
The point I made in the write-up of HP on my website re the German artillery piece was that MMP was now printing game pieces and Chapter H rules for mere prototypes and singleton AFVs while there are still major gaps in the OBs--with AFVs or weapons that numbered in the hundreds or even thousands that still were not represented in ASL even after more than 30 years. I think it is very reasonable to make sure all the major AFVs and Guns are represented in ASL before spending time and effort on prototype weapons that were never a factor on the battlefield.
Just to re-iterate, Mark, I'm truly interested in a list of AFV/Guns/SW which should be included in ASL (but aren't).I would love ??????? to see your list of AFV/Guns that need to be included!
I have my reasons... ?
Like this?The point I made in the write-up of HP on my website re the German artillery piece was that MMP was now printing game pieces and Chapter H rules for mere prototypes and singleton AFVs while there are still major gaps in the OBs--with AFVs or weapons that numbered in the hundreds or even thousands that still were not represented in ASL even after more than 30 years. I think it is very reasonable to make sure all the major AFVs and Guns are represented in ASL before spending time and effort on prototype weapons that were never a factor on the battlefield.
As the war progressed into Germany, the Flak 38/39 did get used for AT duties, similar to the 88. I made the sample as direct response to Mark's HP review on DM where he referenced the Flak 38/39.The FlaK 38/39 will hardly ever show up in the ASL battlefield. Unless we are going to introduce B-17s and have strategic bombing CGs. And in that case I'd rather see effort expended on the Battle of the Atlantic instead.
JR
There are a few cases. Some were covered in Time on Target. They are not typical. I don't object to anyone producing such a counter, including MMP, but it is not one that needs to be produced. As it turned out the FlaK 38 & FlaK 39 were really heavy and so difficult to use in a field army. Most were put on static mounts. A few were mounted on railroad cars, but still to be used against bombers.As the war progressed into Germany, the Flak 38/39 did get used for AT duties, similar to the 88. I made the sample as direct response to Mark's HP review on DM where he referenced the Flak 38/39.
Hence the *NM.There are a few cases. Some were covered in Time on Target. They are not typical. I don't object to anyone producing such a counter, including MMP, but it is not one that needs to be produced. As it turned out the FlaK 38 & FlaK 39 were really heavy and so difficult to use in a field army. Most were put on static mounts. A few were mounted on railroad cars, but still to be used against bombers.
JR