CyberRanger
Member
You make excellent points! One question the staff struggled with while designing W.A.R.S is "who is the ladder leader?"KG_Kharkov said:I would agree that player 1 has a better record, but his victory percentage is not 100% -- he has only won half of his games. It's really a non-loss percentage that you are showing. Where it really doesn't make sense for example is when a guy is 1-0-3. A guy like that has won just 1 of 4 games yet shows up with a 100% victory percentage. In addition, there are different levels of losses and victories in CM, so in fact, Player 2 could be just as good -- maybe he has all Total Victories and all Minor Losses while Player 1 has just squeaked by in his victories.
Just throwing that out there. Maybe it's just really a question of labelling the column correctly -- otherwise, to a lot of people, I don't think it would make sense on first blush.
Just putting that out there.
We decided that each section or even each player can decide! W.A.R.S gives you the ability to order the players how you decide. Here are just a few examples (for the CM Ladder) that any player generate with the W.A.R.S - View the Ladder option:
We could also look at relabeling the column. What would you suggest as a different label? Maybe "Win/Lose Ratio"? The beauty of W.A.R.S. is that WE can easily change this label (and the calculation!)