janusz.maxe
Member
What was the German SW to squad ratio at CG end?
Yes, that would be interesting to note.What was the German SW to squad ratio at CG end?
Didn't your river reinforcements land behind the shrinking Russian perimeter, rather than storm the ferry landings that I had already captured? I don't remember shooting up too many boats, either, odds were just too poor and there were too many closer targets.The. First. Bid. Alzheimer Boy.
A) For the extreme case, I'd probably have suggested starting back on 14N (presuming everyone remembered the front line and what units they had), including purchases as the Russian strategy might have needed adjusting. This would have probably been the most fair, BUT it would have done a few things:Well this as a good a time as any to bring up a major league faux pas that occurred during the fiirst CG day. The refit phase between the day scenario and the night Counterattack to be specific. Somehow during the CPP refit, the fact that the CPP total the Germans were to receive that was to be halved was overlooked and we ended up with a full CPP allotment. Obviously there is no excuse to be made for this error and it was certainly unintentional. This mistake was caught by the Nazis during the 15D scenario and an immediate time-out was called. Everybody got a fresh beer and we attempted to see if this could be corrected in a fair manner without skqueing the entire CG. We all agreed that it could but we needed to decide how to pay back the 9-10 extra CPP without tilting the game one way or the other. The first step taken was to immediately remove the platoons the Axis had on the board during the 15D scenario as reserves. This accounted for almost half the number we needed to repay. Getting the remainder done was a little trickier. We were in the later stages of of the 15D scenario and almost certain to be facing another Night Assault. If the Germans were to repay the entire balance of the CPP's prior to the next scenario it would not necessariliy be the lack of points that would be an issue but the fact that the Russians would be aware that the Germans had no points to spend. We agreed that this much information would indeed be detrimental. The solution we came upon was that the Germans would repay the outstanding balance between the next 2 scenarios and thereby retain some semblence of a fog of war. Subtracting these CPP's before the 16D scenario obviously played a role in selecting an Idle chit that day as well.
Looking back on this whole incident in hindsight, I believe we succeeded in coming up with a fair and equitable solution to to what was an unintentional sticky predicament. If we go back and look at the purchases that were made prior to the 14N scenario the major portion of the spending by the Germans was for reserve units in the form of a rifle coy and 2 pltns. The Night attack on 14N failed to activate a single reserve unit which made me breath a bit easier as far as not having those purchases directly affect that scenario. With both the 15D and 15N scenarios not yielding big gains and having the "debt" repaid by the Idle day on the 16th I was satisfied that we were square and back on track by the 17th. As stated above, it should never have happened, but it did. I think however in the larger scheme of the CG as a whole, the effect of the "faux pas" was negligible. As Mike Pz said, "If nothing else, this is enough to keep this thread going for at least another 6 months." Let's hear what you would've done....
This was only briefly discussed. As we were several evenings into 15D when this came to light no one wanted to go backwards. The conversation was unanimously geared towards solving the problem.A) For the extreme case, I'd probably have suggested starting back on 14N
As I stated above, the majority of the CPP's from the refit in question were used as Reserves which did not play a part in the Russians "not doing so well". I believe they, just as we all were, were just getting their feet wet. By the time the 3rd Night Counterattack came around they had it down to a science.2) Because of the above, if the Russians didn't do so well, it's a second chance
You guys did it right. Admitted the mistake and came up with a mutually acceptable solution. Paying more for the next Coy (to simulate on board set-up cost being paid prior) makes some sense. Plus maybe have the next few purchases depleted could have been done as well.As I stated above, the majority of the CPP's from the refit in question were used as Reserves which did not play a part in the Russians "not doing so well". I believe they, just as we all were, were just getting their feet wet. By the time the 3rd Night Counterattack came around they had it down to a science.
Definitely faster; mainly b/ everyone was used to night rules by that point.The above quote, how much faster were you guys doing the night scenarios later in the CG as opposed to the first one or two dates?
Please don't invite your mother in law to ASL night. :nuts:While the OBA cleared units out from West to East it led the way for a vise like attack from both the North and South that cruched our ball sac like my mother in law could have only dreamed about
This I disagree with. We were looking to even this back up and pulling the units off the board was an immediate subtraction off the German CPP total no matter how you slice it. We would've had enough CPP to put the Rifle Coy on the board in Reserve on 14N regardless so we are talking about the 2 pltns that were set up in Reserve and not activated. I will give you that they did get on board early but I would further argue that had the CPP's not had to have been deducted on the 16th they would've simply been purchased there instead. As there was little progress made on the 15th even with their presence and the 16th was an Idle day I contend that by the end of that day everything would have been similar and the entire debacle had little to no effect on the larger picture whatsover. I personally think we came up with as good a solution as was reasonable to both sides while still keeping the game playable and of course a f***ing blast.B) Barring A, perhaps another good solution would have been to do what you did: remove enough reserves to remove the extra CPP. Rather than remove their spending the next day, charge 3 extra CPP for the Rifle coy for the NEXT scenario (as if they were purchased to be onboard since they had that advantage) and 3 extra CPP for both platoons (3 for each would probably be overkill and I can't see anyone spending that much to start a platoon on board).
This I could probably be convinced of but I think I've already made my case that it all came out in the wash anyway.Paying more for the next Coy (to simulate on board set-up cost being paid prior) makes some sense.
The only issue with this is that we were only looking to get back to even, not looking for any kind of penalty. I'm just happy that I picked it up during 15D not during the next refit or not at all. By catching it when we did, at least removing the Reserve units brought the descrepency down to 5-6 CPP immediately. That represents only 1.5% of the total CPP's refitted by the Germans through the entire CG and then even they were deducted ASAP. If you think we got away with a CPP here consider that that would represent about 1/3 of 1% of the total. I'm not looking to make excuses here, simply to go through what was done so the that the big picture can be appreciated in context.Plus maybe have the next few purchases depleted could have been done as well.