Tourneys at WARFARE HQ?

Rooster

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2002
Messages
145
Reaction score
1
Location
Northern California
Country
llUnited States
I have been asked what tourneys have been runnng at Warfare HQ by outside members... Maybe we can get some new blood in here!

Here is what I notice on the ladder...

League?

QB Tourney?

Is there any others?

Please Post here...

I also know there is a couple of Titans here too...


Please post on thread...

Thanks!
 

Deathdealer

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2002
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
Chiba, Japan
Country
llJapan
Tourneys are excellent thing to meet new faces on battlefield so I hope there are more coming to town ;) though at the moment I can't take part in any as I'm busy with something else...

Anyway as CMBB is almost behind next corner I'm not sure people will easily start a CMBO tourney as you know how tourneys usually take easily 6 or more months to complete. QB battles are easier to start but few scenario tourneys I have had at BoB were a blast and with those you can't really complain about gameyness :p . With Nabla result calculation you don't even need to worry about scenario balance as allied players are compared only to allied players and axis to axis players.
 
Last edited:

Rooster

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2002
Messages
145
Reaction score
1
Location
Northern California
Country
llUnited States
Deathdealer said

With Nabla result calculation you don't even need to worry about scenario balance as allied players are compared only to allied players and axis to axis players.
Can I get a copy of this? this would help me immensely.. Thanks;)
 

Deathdealer

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2002
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
Chiba, Japan
Country
llJapan
Nabla scoring has been discussed on BTS forum several times and "use-the-search" -thingie should bring out something. But I'll try to explain it little (probably quite messy but nevertheless)

Basically idea is that mmm, let's say we have 3 scenario fights totally off balance and results are
92-8, 81-19 and 75-25 ... all victories to first mentioned side

Highest score on one side is given full 100(% if you like) ie
92=100, next score gets 81/92*100(%) and last one gets 75/92*100(%)
same thing with other side ie
25=100, next best is 19/25*100(%) and last 8/25*100(%)

Now we have results for both sides: 92 did best for first side and 25 did best for losing side ie 100(%), while second bests are 88(%) [81/92] and 76% [19/25], last but not least results are 81 (%) [75/92] and 32% [8/25].

So final results would be 92 and 25 were equally good while 81 was second best, 75 third best, 19 second last and finally 8 as last.

These results give only little hint about advantage but if we have 3 scenarios which all those pairs play and for each scenario you calculate end results with Nabla you should clearly get distinction between players abilities...

Maybe it was little fuzzy but as I said try BTS and "Nabla" research ;)
 
Top