Ironmike992003
Member
The Use of Command Radius
First of all thank you both, and Keith I apologize for making the situation so convoluted, as I re-read I almost wonder what I’m asking.
To simplify the issue, and Fezzwig I think you did get the gist of it, Jackson has an attack order. At the time of the attack order being given, I left Rodes on Culp’s Hill for one reason, the health of his Corps due to fighting on July 1st (Iverson, O’Neal) and my own volition on July 2nd (Doles, Daniels).
I wasn’t overly concerned with having a damaged division hold Culp’s Hill, as I discovered during my taking of the hill, it ain’t easy, and Sam didn’t offer that much opposition. I set a position in my order for Jackson's HQ so that Doles could defend Culp's Hill, and that Johnson/Early could attack McAillister's Hill.
On my offensive front I’m not overly concerned with taking McAllister’s Hill as I believe Sam’s 12th Corps is taking heavy losses and he will be performing his 3rd ECR of the game. I think he will not only do this to save his corps, but also I think strategically he is trying to string me out. The only thing I do worry about is rolling an attack stoppage on any of my three attacks (Jackson, Longstreet, Hood/Divisional Goal), as the attacks seem to have naturally become a unified attack pushing Sam further and further south (which again may be part of his “string me out” strategy).
Three turns ago I did issue an order to Rodes, which is in delay status (drat the one column shift for Jackson having the existing attack order), to protect Culp’s Hill. I believe this negates any use of initiative since I would be using it to avoid my order delay status. I didn’t do this in the belief I needed the order to defend, but my intent was to create some flexibility for Jackson by not having Rodes tether him down via command radius.
So my belief still is Rodes can defend his division on Culp’s Hill without an actual order to do so, and he can array his troops using command radius to do so. Would you agree?
Now for a more controversial issue, AP Hill has an order to attack Cemetery Ridge (Longstreet/McLaws has almost cleared Hancock’s 2nd Corps from this position) and he has two additional orders to release Pender’s division and Lane’s Brigade which are both in delay (again drat the one column shift on the acceptance table). Given this is AP Hill's 2nd major order of the game which is is failing to carry-out I'm starting to wonder why there are no provsions in rules for relieving a commander :laugh:
Now for the controversy, why can’t I move Pender into Gettysburg, since he would still be in command radius? I haven’t done this because it doesn’t feel right, but in my mind I’m not sure of the reasoning. My order to AP Hill to release Pender was given before Sam moved Sickles to my rear, but in fairness after I learned Sykes’ 5th Corps would be coming on the board into my rear. Prior to this I thought I would need all of AP Hill’s 3rd Corps to win Cemetery Ridge, but it appears Longstreet is capable of doing this just with McLaws’ Division, however I still would like AP Hill to engage NOW to help take the load off my 1st Corps. What has held me back from making the move is the use of omnipresence as well the realization no one would significantly move a division without an order from the commanding general, without being under the immediate threat of being over-run. In the spirit of the game AP Hill wouldn’t know Lee’s mind, and by moving a full division into Gettysburg he could unknowingly jeopardize Lee’s plan. So I am waiting until AP Hill accepts the order to move Pender into the defense of Gettysburg. I think I answered my own question as I pondered this out.
I only pointed out the above example to underscore some of my confusion around the relationship between orders and command radius. The only thing I know to be specifically “bolted to the ground” are HQ’s once they have moved into place in accordance with their orders. Assuming I am successful with my assaults on McAllister’s Hill and Johnson/Early are at rest, what prevents me from moving at least one of them, if not both, back to Culp’s Hill, especially once Sickles is spotted? I believe Jackson would definitely have done this since it his command.
To me the use of initiative is more an offensive action than a defensive action, unless the defensive position is beyond command radius. Now the flip side to my belief of command radius allowing the freedom of movement, is it’s opposite of being intended to fetter commands from carry out to much of a grandiose offensive scheme as far as having units go willy nilly around the countryside trying to encircle the enemy.
In my reads of the rules I just came to a belief that I can move units without orders as long as I stayed within command radius over territory that I have taken, and providing I was staying true to the original intent of any orders currently assigned.
Please advise, thanks.
First of all thank you both, and Keith I apologize for making the situation so convoluted, as I re-read I almost wonder what I’m asking.
To simplify the issue, and Fezzwig I think you did get the gist of it, Jackson has an attack order. At the time of the attack order being given, I left Rodes on Culp’s Hill for one reason, the health of his Corps due to fighting on July 1st (Iverson, O’Neal) and my own volition on July 2nd (Doles, Daniels).
I wasn’t overly concerned with having a damaged division hold Culp’s Hill, as I discovered during my taking of the hill, it ain’t easy, and Sam didn’t offer that much opposition. I set a position in my order for Jackson's HQ so that Doles could defend Culp's Hill, and that Johnson/Early could attack McAillister's Hill.
On my offensive front I’m not overly concerned with taking McAllister’s Hill as I believe Sam’s 12th Corps is taking heavy losses and he will be performing his 3rd ECR of the game. I think he will not only do this to save his corps, but also I think strategically he is trying to string me out. The only thing I do worry about is rolling an attack stoppage on any of my three attacks (Jackson, Longstreet, Hood/Divisional Goal), as the attacks seem to have naturally become a unified attack pushing Sam further and further south (which again may be part of his “string me out” strategy).
Three turns ago I did issue an order to Rodes, which is in delay status (drat the one column shift for Jackson having the existing attack order), to protect Culp’s Hill. I believe this negates any use of initiative since I would be using it to avoid my order delay status. I didn’t do this in the belief I needed the order to defend, but my intent was to create some flexibility for Jackson by not having Rodes tether him down via command radius.
So my belief still is Rodes can defend his division on Culp’s Hill without an actual order to do so, and he can array his troops using command radius to do so. Would you agree?
Now for a more controversial issue, AP Hill has an order to attack Cemetery Ridge (Longstreet/McLaws has almost cleared Hancock’s 2nd Corps from this position) and he has two additional orders to release Pender’s division and Lane’s Brigade which are both in delay (again drat the one column shift on the acceptance table). Given this is AP Hill's 2nd major order of the game which is is failing to carry-out I'm starting to wonder why there are no provsions in rules for relieving a commander :laugh:
Now for the controversy, why can’t I move Pender into Gettysburg, since he would still be in command radius? I haven’t done this because it doesn’t feel right, but in my mind I’m not sure of the reasoning. My order to AP Hill to release Pender was given before Sam moved Sickles to my rear, but in fairness after I learned Sykes’ 5th Corps would be coming on the board into my rear. Prior to this I thought I would need all of AP Hill’s 3rd Corps to win Cemetery Ridge, but it appears Longstreet is capable of doing this just with McLaws’ Division, however I still would like AP Hill to engage NOW to help take the load off my 1st Corps. What has held me back from making the move is the use of omnipresence as well the realization no one would significantly move a division without an order from the commanding general, without being under the immediate threat of being over-run. In the spirit of the game AP Hill wouldn’t know Lee’s mind, and by moving a full division into Gettysburg he could unknowingly jeopardize Lee’s plan. So I am waiting until AP Hill accepts the order to move Pender into the defense of Gettysburg. I think I answered my own question as I pondered this out.
I only pointed out the above example to underscore some of my confusion around the relationship between orders and command radius. The only thing I know to be specifically “bolted to the ground” are HQ’s once they have moved into place in accordance with their orders. Assuming I am successful with my assaults on McAllister’s Hill and Johnson/Early are at rest, what prevents me from moving at least one of them, if not both, back to Culp’s Hill, especially once Sickles is spotted? I believe Jackson would definitely have done this since it his command.
To me the use of initiative is more an offensive action than a defensive action, unless the defensive position is beyond command radius. Now the flip side to my belief of command radius allowing the freedom of movement, is it’s opposite of being intended to fetter commands from carry out to much of a grandiose offensive scheme as far as having units go willy nilly around the countryside trying to encircle the enemy.
In my reads of the rules I just came to a belief that I can move units without orders as long as I stayed within command radius over territory that I have taken, and providing I was staying true to the original intent of any orders currently assigned.
Please advise, thanks.