footsteps
Just visiting
Eh, close enough for government work!
Eh, close enough for government work!
Why would anyone assume that satisfaction can only be gleaned from playing them all? If collecting (or hoarding, in many cases) wasn't one of the reasons to purchase ASL stuff, there would be much less of it out there.Somewhat related: In the knitting community, there's the term "stash acquired beyond life expectancy (S.A.B.L.E.)". I guess most ASL players also have more ASL scenarios than they can play through in the rest of their (long, happy) lives.
Materialist Scientist by day, Immaterialist Gamer by night. It's a bird, it's a plane, it's... Meh Man!As a scientist, I wear a materialist hat for my day job, and since it's during the day (where I am) I would like to point out that infinity is a mystical concept that has no bearing on material reality. There is no physical way of confirming that numbers larger than the number of particles in the universe actually exist (or any way to ascribe them meaning), and so I am comfortable saying that there are infinite ways to play any ASL scenario. Certainly it is no less absurd from a materialist view than talking about "infinity" as meaning something other than "a very large number indeed".
Catch me in the evening when I'm no longer a materialist, and I might have a different view.
But scientists and mathematicians don't always agree. Infinity in the mathematic sense is a possibility. It is an ENDLESS number. All other numbers come to an end.As a scientist, I wear a materialist hat for my day job, and since it's during the day (where I am) I would like to point out that infinity is a mystical concept that has no bearing on material reality. There is no physical way of confirming that numbers larger than the number of particles in the universe actually exist (or any way to ascribe them meaning), and so I am comfortable saying that there are infinite ways to play any ASL scenario. Certainly it is no less absurd from a materialist view than talking about "infinity" as meaning something other than "a very large number indeed".
Catch me in the evening when I'm no longer a materialist, and I might have a different view.
Indeed! Mathematicians are mostly disgusting Platonists who might as well believe in witchcraft, and it is unfortunate that the tools they produce are so useful for Good Materialist Science.But scientists and mathematicians don't always agree. Infinity in the mathematic sense is a possibility. It is an ENDLESS number. All other numbers come to an end.
As a computer scientist, I think you're all crazy because you don't start counting at 0. -- jimIndeed! Mathematicians are mostly disgusting Platonists who might as well believe in witchcraft, and it is unfortunate that the tools they produce are so useful for Good Materialist Science.
[Again, come back this evening for a different opinion].
Should we count on that?[Again, come back this evening for a different opinion].
Maybe for some further insight, we should instead count the number of finite possibilities of ASL?Should we count on that?
I'm game. Let's go...Maybe for some further insight, we should instead count the number of finite possibilities of ASL?
von Marwitz
Then this one is for you:I gotta take my socks off if we count past 10....
You can tytrate(?) and go 10^100^100 short hand for a big number.So if the possible moves for a chess game are 10 to the power of 135. Then what are the likely possible moves for a game of RB? 10 to the power of what? Or what about all the possible moves for the whole ASL system? 10 to the power of 5 billion?