Gunner Scott
Forum Guru
Yes I do appreciate what others do for designing themed scenario packs and all, but what I alway dislike is when people show up to a thread and state their research is better then the other guys, that just smacks of elitism. Instead, use a little tack and just say your doing your own thing, no need to slam other peoples hard work, but that seems to be the norm in this hobby unfortunately.
Scott
Scott
I think what Fernando and his compadres may by trying to do is to establish a baseline for the capabilities, and characteristics of each major faction (with exceptions based on the front in question). At the moment, there does not appear to be a consensus on how the various participants should be portrayed.
It's not unlike the rework the Finns are undergoing at the moment. Had more time and resources been available back in the day, the Soviets arguably would have a more nuanced (and richer) MMC structure that included second-line troops, and perhaps a lower-order Conscript MMC (3-3-6), at least for the period prior to mid 1942, or thereabouts. They might also have had restrictions on Infantry movement prior to 1941 (i.e. some form of Platoon Movement), and a unique, late-war structure. (Contrast the Russian MMC structure with the Ami squads found in Rising Sun alone!)
That said, I agree with Carl that the best scenarios are the ones that distill the essential flavours of an engagement into a manageable (SSR-light, et. al.) and engaging contest.
It takes all sorts of people to build a house. Some excel at framing. Others enjoy millwork. The best designers are jacks of all trades.