Snap shot At Unit entering higher elevation

[Stewart]

Did you send Perry the diagram as well...or tell him which board we are using?

Yes, didn't need to relist it here.
Is the wording of the inquiry acceptable?

 

[Justiciar]

Is the wording of the inquiry acceptable?

I think it a good go. Esp. as Klas notes this thread will be referenced, so one assumes Perry will not only see the diagram, but will also get added info from the comments made here.

 

[Russ Isaia]

Ah yeah, guess I was remembering an older footnote that has been changed to an errata change to B10.1

It is still Footnote B.3A in my cut and paste RB. And I don't see any explicit errata change to B10.1 other than one that, among other things, added a reference to footnote 3A.

 

[Eagle4ty]

It is still Footnote B.3A in my cut and paste RB. And I don't see any explicit errata change to B10.1 other than one that, among other things, added a reference to footnote 3A.

The one I was thinking of Russ had the statement of printed crest lines beneath the terrain in question and a statement about using the printed terrain as depicted to determine elevation. I think (i.e. seem to recall) this was removed as a footnote(s) errata change to a rule errata change in Journal 10 or 11.

 

[Russ Isaia]

The one I was thinking of Russ had the statement of printed crest lines beneath the terrain in question and a statement about using the printed terrain as depicted to determine elevation. I think (i.e. seem to recall) this was removed as a footnote(s) errata change to a rule errata change in Journal 10 or 11.

Journal 10 only added that text, with the B10.1 change requiring use of visible Crest Lines beneath terrain for LOS purposes and a new footnote 3A encouraging use of invisible but deduced Crest Lines beneath terrain for LOS purposes. Maybe there was something even earlier.

 

[Stewart]

What's the normal return time on questions? I usually don't submit any.

 

[zgrose]

Days to weeks is my experience. After a month or so, you might want to just send it in again.

 

[Eagle4ty]

In my experience it depends on the depth of the question, what's happening around the time you submitted a question (ASLOK, WO, etc.) and the clarity of the question. I've had them answered in a little less than a couple of weeks and others a couple of months (somethimes with a clarification or errata issued henceforth).

 

[Stewart]

Bump???

 

[Mister T]

In my experience it depends on the depth of the question, what's happening around the time you submitted a question (ASLOK, WO, etc.) and the clarity of the question. I've had them answered in a little less than a couple of weeks and others a couple of months (somethimes with a clarification or errata issued henceforth).

Sometimes it's never answered as well.

 

[Stewart]

Wonderful

 

[Stewart]

I haven't seen an OFFICIAL response to this query.
Resubmit??

 

[bendizoid]

No need - this thread will be referenced...

For you klas