JoeArthur
Elder Member
Should they?
The advantages would be:
These all reduce the price of the product:
When I receive a scenario pack it gets scanned in and the paper put away never to see the light of day again. I do not even print the scans out anymore - I view them on the monitor.
What does everyone else think?
The advantages would be:
These all reduce the price of the product:
- no printing costs.
- no mailing costs.
- if sending abroad no sales taxes for the recipient (here in the UK we have to pay 20% sales tax plus a GBP£8 "handling charge" on stuff coming into the country).
- the TPP is not left with a pile of unsold scenario packs.
- with paper you cannot amend the scenarios. With scans you just send out a new version with the errata included.
- you can improve the scenario. When you send a paper scenario out into the world that's it - all done. With an electronic version if something needs tweaking after seeing the ROAR results build up then it is possible to easily do so. MMP are doing this with paper - re-issuing some scenarios.
When I receive a scenario pack it gets scanned in and the paper put away never to see the light of day again. I do not even print the scans out anymore - I view them on the monitor.
What does everyone else think?