jrv
Forum Guru
That might better reflect the army, and in the Winter War too.
Also I would not be opposed to modifying the way leaders are handled. As it stands sides with IPM either have to have a lot of leaders (very ahistorical; for example I find the CPVA force in Centurions Retreat way, way over-led, which I suspect is due to their vulnerability to losing their mobility) or worry that the enemy will concentrate all fire on them, leaving the side unable to move. I suggest it might be nice to have a way to generate new leaders when old ones are lost, somewhat like leader creation. You might even go so far as to allow removal of a broken leader in exchange for a roll on the IPM Leader Creation Table. I call it a new table, but it might be the existing one with suitable drm. I haven't really thought about the details as such. This modification would give the side limited leaders while at the same time making it less susceptible to having a single point of failure.
JR
Also I would not be opposed to modifying the way leaders are handled. As it stands sides with IPM either have to have a lot of leaders (very ahistorical; for example I find the CPVA force in Centurions Retreat way, way over-led, which I suspect is due to their vulnerability to losing their mobility) or worry that the enemy will concentrate all fire on them, leaving the side unable to move. I suggest it might be nice to have a way to generate new leaders when old ones are lost, somewhat like leader creation. You might even go so far as to allow removal of a broken leader in exchange for a roll on the IPM Leader Creation Table. I call it a new table, but it might be the existing one with suitable drm. I haven't really thought about the details as such. This modification would give the side limited leaders while at the same time making it less susceptible to having a single point of failure.
JR
Last edited: