Searching and Defensive First Fire

Garr1809

Member
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
56
Reaction score
2
Location
Winnipeg
Country
llCanada
Hi,

I was wondering if a MMC spends a MP to search and the defender wishes to preform defensive first fire, does he finish the search procedure first?

Thanks,
Garr
 

ScottRomanowski

Forum Guru
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
1,977
Reaction score
2,630
Location
Massachusetts
First name
Scott
Country
llUnited States
Yes, all D1F comes after the MF/MP are expended and any results from that expenditure. E.g., if you try to place smoke grenades, the D1F comes after the smoke is placed (if it is placed). You gain control by entering a Location, even if the unit is eliminated by D1F. But the one MF to Search is a separate expenditure from any MF spent to enter the Location. For example, spend 2MF to enter a woods hex, possible D1F, then spend 1MF to search, possible D1F.
 

Stewart

Elder Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
3,714
Reaction score
732
Location
Russia
Country
llRussia
Hi,

I was wondering if a MMC spends a MP to search and the defender wishes to preform defensive first fire, does he finish the search procedure first?

Thanks,
Garr
I think among the "common" MF expenditures, only DC usage is a "before you finish, I get to shoot" type DFire.
 

JimWhite

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
926
Location
Newark
Country
llUnited States
But the one MF to Search is a separate expenditure from any MF spent to enter the Location. For example, spend 2MF to enter a woods hex, possible D1F, then spend 1MF to search, possible D1F.
If I remember correctly...that if fired upon when entering the location (thus potentially leaving residual FP in that location)...that should the unit spend another MF to search they would then be subject to search casualties due to that placed residual (if any) or that from any other pre-existing residual already in place.

There are also other reasons for search casualties besides residual...but that is for another possible thread.
 

EagleIV

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
1,069
Location
California
Country
llUnited States
If I remember correctly...that if fired upon when entering the location (thus potentially leaving residual FP in that location)...that should the unit spend another MF to search they would then be subject to search casualties due to that placed residual (if any) or that from any other pre-existing residual already in place.

There are also other reasons for search casualties besides residual...but that is for another possible thread.
Not Search Casualties, but they would be subject to an attack by the RFP.
 

JimWhite

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
926
Location
Newark
Country
llUnited States
Not Search Casualties, but they would be subject to an attack by the RFP.
Back at home with the rulebook...and this is what I was thinking applied:

A12.154 SEARCH CASUALTIES: If a Location that is Searched/Mopped-Up contains an armed Good Order unit/minefield/Residual FP/HE FFE Blast Area, or if the DEFENDER has any Booby Trap capability (B28.9), the DEFENDER may make one Casualty dr per Search dr in an effort to cause casualties to the searching/Mopping-Up unit(s).
 

synicbast

ASLOK Junkie
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
1,656
Reaction score
475
Location
Wellington New Zealand
First name
Peter
Country
llNew Zealand
Two different situations:
  1. Residual FP that affects the searching unit in its own location upon MF expenditure to perform the search. - Resolved upon Movement expenditure
  2. A searched location (not necessarily the location that the searching unit is in) that contains Residual FP - Resolved as part of the Search procedure resolution, not the movement
 

FrankH.

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Messages
1,046
Reaction score
269
Location
New Mexico York
I have asked some of this question at least once before.

The fact that A12.152 says all units searching may not be pinned, if they are to search - as they end their movement (by expending one more MF) implies to me that if they are pinned by DFF or other reasons (e.g., minefield attack) they cannot search. Since a unit cannot expend 1 MF if pinned, it must be referring to becoming pinned after that 1 MF expenditure.

That is my take. Many other people do not agree with me, for some reason.
 

Doug Leslie

Forum Guru
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
2,094
Location
Scotland
Country
llUnited Kingdom
I have asked some of this question at least once before.

The fact that A12.152 says all units searching may not be pinned, if they are to search - as they end their movement (by expending one more MF) implies to me that if they are pinned by DFF or other reasons (e.g., minefield attack) they cannot search. Since a unit cannot expend 1 MF if pinned, it must be referring to becoming pinned after that 1 MF expenditure.

That is my take. Many other people do not agree with me, for some reason.
I fall into the latter category! :)

A unit might enter a hex with the intention of performing a search dr but be pinned by residual FP/defensive first fire before it gets the opportunity to do so. My reading of the rules is that once the search dr is made, any residual FP/defensive first fire attacks are resolved after the search is performed. So if a searching squad suffers casualty reduction as a result of defensive fire, it still receives the -1 modifier to the search dr. If it is pinned, the search is still carried out.
 
Top