- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,648
- Reaction score
- 5,632
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
Rule:C9.3 Spotters
Question:A Spotter must be Good Order to spot.
A new Spotter may not be designated until the original Spotter is "eliminated, broken or captured".
Does this mean that a berserk spotter forfeits any possbility of designing another Spotter, at the same time as it, being no more in Good Order, cannot spot. And thus, does one have to wait, either its elimination, either its return to normal (most often after having charged the ENEMY and being no more adjacent to the mortar it originally spotted for)?
Yes.
Other question about spotting.
C 9.31 example (last 3 lines) : does this mean a spotter loses a mortar acquisition under all the loss conditions expressed in C6.5 (as if it were firing the mortar itself), such as : interdicting, leaving present Location, etc.?
Yes.
Two remarks about the rules (but I might be a bad reader) :
- Only does the example of Spotting rules prove that acquisition is possible.
It is possible.
Question:A Spotter must be Good Order to spot.
A new Spotter may not be designated until the original Spotter is "eliminated, broken or captured".
Does this mean that a berserk spotter forfeits any possbility of designing another Spotter, at the same time as it, being no more in Good Order, cannot spot. And thus, does one have to wait, either its elimination, either its return to normal (most often after having charged the ENEMY and being no more adjacent to the mortar it originally spotted for)?
Yes.
Other question about spotting.
C 9.31 example (last 3 lines) : does this mean a spotter loses a mortar acquisition under all the loss conditions expressed in C6.5 (as if it were firing the mortar itself), such as : interdicting, leaving present Location, etc.?
Yes.
Two remarks about the rules (but I might be a bad reader) :
- Only does the example of Spotting rules prove that acquisition is possible.
It is possible.