pybarrondo
Member
(By way of explanation, I had submitted this to get confirmation that the old Romanowski Q&A still applied, since there's no indication in the actual rulebook that this is the case and the rule there can reasonably be read as saying that wire is ignored for identifying the nearest woods/building hex for rout destination determination — Wire is a Fortification, after all, and one enters and exits it as those terms are generally understood outside the rulebook, and even the rulebook refers to a Wire Exit dr. Here is the answer. IMO this really should get official errata treatment at some point, since it needs to be reflected in the rulebook itself):
Q. Rule A10.531 says, in part, "The cost to enter/exit Fortifications within a hex are not part of the total MF cost used when calculating the nearest building/woods hex." No exception is made for Wire, which is a Fortification. Is the MF cost of Wire then ignored when calculating the nearest building/woods hex for purposes of determining a rout destination?
If yes, should this old guidance in the Scott Romanowski files be disregarded? A10.51 & B26 For purposes (only) of determining the shortest route in MF, assume wire will cost 1MF. [Letter53]
A. No (you do not enter/exit that fortification).
No.
....Perry
MMP
Q. Rule A10.531 says, in part, "The cost to enter/exit Fortifications within a hex are not part of the total MF cost used when calculating the nearest building/woods hex." No exception is made for Wire, which is a Fortification. Is the MF cost of Wire then ignored when calculating the nearest building/woods hex for purposes of determining a rout destination?
If yes, should this old guidance in the Scott Romanowski files be disregarded? A10.51 & B26 For purposes (only) of determining the shortest route in MF, assume wire will cost 1MF. [Letter53]
A. No (you do not enter/exit that fortification).
No.
....Perry
MMP
Last edited: