RF errata?

[Honza]

I do not have my RF yet, but I have been told that in RO CG III (The Russian attack in December) the Russians only have 4 attack chits out of a 16 day CG. Is this in fact an error? Should it be the Germans who have four attack chits?

 

[Perry]

You'll probably know by the time you get your RF.

 

[Honza]

That sounds suspiciously like there is not an issue. Did the guy who said the Russians only get four attack chits get it wrong?

 

[Perry]

That sounds suspiciously like there is not an issue. Did the guy who said the Russians only get four attack chits get it wrong?

I was hoping it would sound like there will probably be an official answer soon.

 

[Honza]

I was hoping it would sound like there will probably be an official answer soon.

Oh okay. lol. Thanks.

 

[Perry]

In RO CG III, the Germans (not the Russians) are limited to four attack chits.
The Russians are limited to four Night scenarios.
Errata will be forthcoming.

 

[Honza]

Thank you for the clarification.

 

[Perry]

Thank you for the clarification.

Got your RF yet?

 

[Honza]

Got your RF yet?

Yes I got it yesterday. Beat you to it.

 

[apbills]

In RO CG III the Initial German Forces have listed "20L(8) AA x 2". Is this supposed to be note 26, the 20L(6) AA? I don't have an ordnance note with an [8] IFE listed.

 

[Honza]

In RO CG III the Initial German Forces have listed "20L(8) AA x 2". Is this supposed to be note 26, the 20L(6) AA? I don't have an ordnance note with an [8] IFE listed.

I think you are correct. In the RF countermix they have provided 20L(6) AA counters.

 

[apbills]

Just a pet peeve of mine, but I see the wording in 11.6122 was not changed. "Each side whose SAN is currently zero has it automatically raised to 2". Per A14.4, "If the SAN is reduced to 1, remove the Sniper Target Selection counter from the game." so technically, you never get to a zero SAN.

 

[apbills]

have found two sentences in the new rules where the ≥ or ≤ sign is removed. the first is in 11.6142:
"Each side makes a Secret dr on the following table for each friendly (including Captured) non-Isolated, non-Dug-In Retained AFV Pltn (or part thereof) [EXC: German SPW Pltn] that has had ≥ one AFV of its Pltn on the map in at least one CG scenario to determine whether the Pltn (or remainder thereof) must be Withdrawn." is the old sentence.
"Each side makes a Secret dr on the following table for each friendly (including Captured) non-Isolated, non-Dug-In Retained AFV Pltn (or part thereof) [EXC: German SPW Pltn] that has had one AFV of its Pltn on the map in at least one CG scenario to determine whether the Pltn (or remainder thereof) must be Withdrawn." is the new sentence.

11.6143 had the following:
"A dr of ≤ the current turn number immediately places that AFV under Recall."
and is now:
"A dr of the current turn number immediately places that AFV under Recall."

Are these removals mistakes?

 

[klasmalmstrom]

Those two signs were not present in the 2nd Edition Chapter O, which I'll bet was used as input. Which would explain their absence. The first one is not crucial (IMO), but the second one does change the rule.

Guess no one spotted their absence in the 2nd Edition Chapter O all these years.

 

[Perry]

We have added two errata to the list on our Red Factories product page:

O11.57: In the INITIAL GERMAN OB, replace “20L(8) AA × 2” with “20L(6) AA × 2”.

O11.6143: lines 3-4, after “dr of” add “≤” so the third sentence starts “A dr of ≤ the current turn…”.

MMP's Products

 

[Kevin Kenneally]

There is also a yellow piece of paper about one of the RF scenarios to delete a sentence.

 

[klasmalmstrom]

There is also a yellow piece of paper about one of the RF scenarios to delete a sentence.

That's already listed on the product page. http://www.multimanpublishing.com/tabid/58/CategoryID/20/ProductID/343/Default.aspx

RO6 The Playing Field: In SSR 1, delete sentence “Place a Flame counter in hex F27.”.

 

[Honza]

In RO CG III A Party In Our Streets when there is a Russian Assault do they have to capture 12 extra stone locations (which is the same as a Russian assault in all the other CGs) or do they have to capture 24? (which is what the German normally needs to win his assault).

 

[Honza]

Since the Russians are attacking in RO CG III I figured the VC for the CG scenarios would be different than when they defend in a CG.

 

[klasmalmstrom]

Since the Russians are attacking in RO CG III I figured the VC for the CG scenarios would be different than when they defend in a CG.

Most likely it should be....