This question refers to A8.2, A8.23, A8.26, B9.34, and C3.33 / C9.2
A Russian 447 is non-assault moving behind a wall and is first fired on by a German 50mm mortar. The wall forms part of the target hex (containing the 447) and LOS crosses the wall.
The mortar scores a hit and keeps rate.
I did resolve the next three cases correctly?
CASE 1: IFT attack on mortar hit: 50mm = 6 FP halfed for Area Type Target / Mortar fire = 3 FP rounded down to 2 FP. DRM = 0 (-1 FFNAM, +2 wall reduced to +1 by indirect fire). DR is 2,6 = 8+1 = 9. No Effect but mortar kept rate.
CASE 2: Residual Fire from IFT: Unless the mortar elects to give up ROF, then no residual FP is left in the hex.
CASE 3: Mortar elects to give up ROF to place residual FP: I said no FP is placed because 2 FP is halfed to 1 FP and then reduced to 0 FP because of the wall.
Did I get these Cases right? If not please point me to the right rules section cause I am confused.
Thanks
Alan
A Russian 447 is non-assault moving behind a wall and is first fired on by a German 50mm mortar. The wall forms part of the target hex (containing the 447) and LOS crosses the wall.
The mortar scores a hit and keeps rate.
I did resolve the next three cases correctly?
CASE 1: IFT attack on mortar hit: 50mm = 6 FP halfed for Area Type Target / Mortar fire = 3 FP rounded down to 2 FP. DRM = 0 (-1 FFNAM, +2 wall reduced to +1 by indirect fire). DR is 2,6 = 8+1 = 9. No Effect but mortar kept rate.
CASE 2: Residual Fire from IFT: Unless the mortar elects to give up ROF, then no residual FP is left in the hex.
CASE 3: Mortar elects to give up ROF to place residual FP: I said no FP is placed because 2 FP is halfed to 1 FP and then reduced to 0 FP because of the wall.
Did I get these Cases right? If not please point me to the right rules section cause I am confused.
Thanks
Alan