You completely missed the point, which is par for the course for you.
My point and what the others are also saying is that there is room for both, it is not about comparison, it is about having the wonderful choice to play either type of ASL action, as opposed to having no choice at all.
I have played 1,000s of ASL scenarios, I have perhaps written *maybe* two dozen AARs and these very brief. I personally do not like to write AARs, there are others that love to do so and are very good at it with photos and diagrams and all sort of reader experience extras which makes great reading. But I am certain there are a host of others who, like me, don't write AARs either, each for their own reasons. I can't even be bothered to write a sentence that scenario Jxxx was great or average. I don't feel the need to regularly express my views in public about whether a scenario / CG is good, bad or in between. Why? B/c my view does not matter, what matters is the individual experience of the person that plays the scenario themselves, which for a variety of reasons (skill level, dice, individual tastes [e.g. some people dislike night, I don't]) will be different than my own.
Finally, you need to come to the realization that not every ASL scenario/module is designed with just you in mind Scott, as much as that would suit you and likely lead to less friction on this forum.