- Nov 28, 2003
- Reaction score
Get specific. Quote me. Quit playing virgin and make nonsense. Your words mean something, don't they, so get SPECIFIC.Cheetah772 said:And how brave of you to decry the American invasion and more than willing to let thousands of American lives, both civilians and soldiers perish just so you can have your little world order full of dictatorships with WMDs going about with little or no consequences.
Yeah, you would rather to have America stopped than to allow her to act out in her own self-defense against Saddam's Iraq. I guess you would rather have 100,000 Americans to lose their lives before the Europe or the rest of world allow America to defend herself.
Yes sir, you're very brave, now, aren't you?
My world of dictatorships? WMDs? You a Martian or what? What me, burn-mark in the head, termination? I am not brave or chicken, I just ask justice and fair play.
Yes, rather 100k American SOLDIERS die a SOLDIER's death than civilians doing the same. Rule of law also means rule of war LAWS. American lives are per se not worth more than others, unless you redefine standards. But you do. Per se. It's sad. You are not a tolerant conservative, you are an apologetist. It brands YOU Dan.
I personally don't like Pakistan for example. It has WMD. The US has WMD. What makes the US so f-g morally superior to Pakistan to be allowed to possess them? Only your perception of morality, gained through a position of strength, peace through superior warpower. Deterrrance. The ONLY nation EVER to use WMD (real MWD) waws the US. Against civilians. You ** hipocryte, you are a slave under your own parols, no better than a Taliban or a Soviet Comissaar. Grow up. Disarm the US first. Or noone. RULE BY LAW OR RULE BY FORCE, DECIDE WHICH IS IT. Skip the moral pekoral.