- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,595
- Reaction score
- 5,557
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
This may help us, regarding a not so recent debate...
Question : When a SSR specifies that a squad equivalent may set up HIP, may one set up 1 squad (or 2 HS) AND 4 SMCs (in other locations), as 4 SMCs are 0 squad equivalents (i. e. 1 squad + 4 SMCs = 1 squad equivalent)?
Answer : If the SSR allows SMC stacked with the HIP squad(-equivalent)(s) to be HIP, then only SMC stacked with HIP MMC may benefit from this SSR.
If the SSR refers to only "MMC"/"squad(s)"/"HS"/"crew(s)" being HIP, then no SMC may benefit from this SSR.
If the SSR only mentions "squad-equivalents," then 1-5 SMC may set up HIP in lieu of a HS.
....Perry
MMP
Question : When a SSR specifies that a squad equivalent may set up HIP, may one set up 1 squad (or 2 HS) AND 4 SMCs (in other locations), as 4 SMCs are 0 squad equivalents (i. e. 1 squad + 4 SMCs = 1 squad equivalent)?
Answer : If the SSR allows SMC stacked with the HIP squad(-equivalent)(s) to be HIP, then only SMC stacked with HIP MMC may benefit from this SSR.
If the SSR refers to only "MMC"/"squad(s)"/"HS"/"crew(s)" being HIP, then no SMC may benefit from this SSR.
If the SSR only mentions "squad-equivalents," then 1-5 SMC may set up HIP in lieu of a HS.
....Perry
MMP