Tim Niesen
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,209
- Reaction score
- 146
- Country
Well after illness of a wife and s breakdown of a car caused a two week delay. Uncle Bill came on a special Monday edition. Steve was working. Tim
In many CGs heroes are removed in exchange for battle-hardening a unit. See O11.6112 in Red Barricades, for example. It would surprise me (but only mildly) if heroes were allowed to accumulate. If a side builds up a collection, the heroes can be brought together and given MGs to operate as pairs (full FP, down two DRM per hero-operated MG), then form killer firegroups that vaporize all before them.In this campaign game, heroes are forever, while the fanaticism counters go away at the end of the session.
While possibly literally true, you can think of HMG AA as an abstract representation of "non-AA ground fire." Because HMGs can't firegroup [EXC: mandatory FG; E7.5] HMGs are not all that effective AA weapons against mid- and late-war aircraft anyway.I should add that Don believes that giving Russian HMG an AA capacity is ahistorical. Only two thousand or so were made out of three hundred thousand plus. Tim
He might be thinking of the quad Maxims that had a very heavy conical base and in ASL is mounted on the GAZ-4M-AA (SVN 43). However the Sokolov wheeled mount could have a pair of legs attached at the front (in front of any attached shield) and that transformed that mount into an AA mount. The Sokolov mount and variants was used for both the PM 1910 Maxim and the later SK-43. The distinction between HMG and MMG is quite arbitrary in ASL, think of a HMG as a MMG but with all its accessories, gewgaws and more ammo.I should add that Don believes that giving Russian HMG an AA capacity is ahistorical. Only two thousand or so were made out of three hundred thousand plus. Tim
Don't forget that it's only HMG, whether standard HMG or 12.7mm/.50", not MMG. It's all a bit of ASL abstraction. Whether the crew had the pair of extra legs or just had a bit of initiative and found a convenient barrel/stump/big rock doesn't really matter, it's whether they managed enough elevation that does. The Soviets, due to their relative lack of proper light AA guns, encouraged the use of any and all forms of AA fire, no matter how ineffective it was most times. Rifles, ATR, LMGs (DP-28), even SMG. So limiting AA fire to HMG could be considered to reflect the limited effectiveness of such a multitude of weapons.Paul, I will have him read your depth of detail concerning Russian MGs and if he wants to retort, I will print it. Thanks for your in depth analysis, perhaps he will allow us to use our numerous Russian HMGs in AA mode. I dread Axis air superiority in the coming sessions, and the three potential Rumanian HMGs have a breakdown number of 9. Tim
.50-cal or .51-cal. it's a mute point. If he thinks that a Ma Duce (or equivalent thereof) should be less than 5PP, he's probably never had to man-pack the bugger with tripod, spare barrle, T&E not to mention sufficient ammo to warrant a ROF. Not a small undertaking for an entire squad or section loaded down with their own equipment to boot. If he's a Col. as you intimated, he'd probably never had to hump that bugger, it was always up to us earth pigs to do the heavy lifting for the officers, they just told us where to put it-changed their minds-repositioned it a couple of times and went on their merry way.Paul, He's a contrary cus. I obey. His spouse feeds me. We understand that the 50 cal can use its AA mode. It's the standard Russian HMG (5pp) which he objects too.