footsteps
Just visiting
That would only work for Zombie scenarios.
Orchard-Brush terrain
- Thread starter Tuomo
- Start date
semenza
Senior Member
Is that from the ERule Book?
It is not listed in the 1st or 2nd Edition of the Pocket RB index.
Seth
apbills
Elder Member
It is from my eASLRB, not the official one. I update various parts of it when new things come out. Sometimes I can't get to it right away, but as soon as I find something missing, I update.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
It isn't in the eASLRB index - but the rule exists.
apbills
Elder Member
This reminded me about another link I wanted in here, which is now added to each of the index entries for the terrain listed in D6.21.
Somewhere there is an updated index (perhaps more than one place) with many of the additions added to it. I don't think MMP has updated since the 2nd Edition came out.
Somewhere there is an updated index (perhaps more than one place) with many of the additions added to it. I don't think MMP has updated since the 2nd Edition came out.
ASLSARGE
Elder Member
Not in my 2nd Edition rulebook or in the Pocket rulebook....but it is in the 3rd edition Rat Charts. Odd.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
Rat charts are TPP.
So they would have added details not comprised in official stuff.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
Yes.
And your eASLRB is the eASLRB that everyone has (speaking of the official one).
If you look up its Index under Woods, you won't find a mention of Light Woods.
Vinnie
See Dummies in the index
I did start an attempt to get an updated index together but that project got shelved in favour of other work. Seems I need to get innit again.
lluis61
Senior Member
Hey, don't get angry... I'm not the one saying that "Rat charts are TPP. So they would have added details not comprised in official stuff"
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
<shrug> Where do you see I was angry? I was just factual.<shrug>
BTW were you speaking of wargame vault's official eASLRB?
lluis61
Senior Member
Of course... With my name watermarked and all...
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
See my post, #24, which displays the index entry of Woods, from the official eASLRB: no mention of Light Woods (contrary from what was displayed by apbills in pist #25).
See here : no entry for Light Woods in the Index either:
The rule exists in chapter B, though.
So the Index could be revised.
apbills
Elder Member
Just to be clear, my snip was from my own html rulebook, developed by myself, for myself, and occasionally displayed on the site. I do use input from many people in the hobby, including (but not limited to) all AH/MMP/TPP games/scenario packs I own and Q&A from Klas and Scott. An effort which began back in the late 90's and now on version 7.4.
von Marwitz
Forum Guru
lluis61
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
The rule is in all rulebooks since Hakkaa Päälle, where it was implemented.
And you are right that the pdf reader allows to navigate the different chapters. If you are only looking for a given paragraph, it works indeed.
But for more complex rules interactions,.the Index helps a lot.
The discussion was about the Index however, which strangely has no entry about Light Woods, neither under "Light Woods" nor under "Woods".
And you are right that the pdf reader allows to navigate the different chapters. If you are only looking for a given paragraph, it works indeed.
But for more complex rules interactions,.the Index helps a lot.
The discussion was about the Index however, which strangely has no entry about Light Woods, neither under "Light Woods" nor under "Woods".
lluis61
Senior Member
I was only trying to be informative: If a third party mentions a definite rule (for instance, and I'm fantasizing, A251.344: Little Bavarian Drummer), perhaps it's quicker to go to the "father" subchapter than search the index that, for me, it's very clumsy. I'm not saying that it's not useful, however, and that should be updated- But, also: How many years have we expected the eASLRB, and how wonderful it is? I'm grateful to have it and play with it (playing and not playing).
Wayne
Doing Plenty, Kinda Slow
An earlier version of the eASLRB omitted the TOC entries for the Light Woods and Prepared Fire Zone.
Those TOC omissions were fixed as p/o a point-release after I used easlrbsupport@multimanpublishing.com as per the Intro to the Electronic Edition, page iii:
I did not notice (until this thread) that those Chap B additions came not only w/out (initial) TOC support but also (still) w/out Index support.
[I've sent a brief note re this Index defect and expect it will be addressed (w/out urgency) in some TBD future point-release.]
Those TOC omissions were fixed as p/o a point-release after I used easlrbsupport@multimanpublishing.com as per the Intro to the Electronic Edition, page iii:
I did not notice (until this thread) that those Chap B additions came not only w/out (initial) TOC support but also (still) w/out Index support.
[I've sent a brief note re this Index defect and expect it will be addressed (w/out urgency) in some TBD future point-release.]