Onslaught to Orsha

[Capt Harlock]

Hi,

I am very impressed with the look and feel of this historical pack about Operation Bagration. Any thoughts on the CG or scenarios?


Mitch

 

[CPRad]

Hey

If you check the AAR's you'll see a pretty good write up of the scenarios .. I think there are two ...

anyway if you were to go back a couple of pages from the trend titles ... pg. 5 I think (this is the only way I know how to tell you) you'll see some other comments from the gang on a trend caled OTO etc etc ...

I've got the game but as of yet haven't played it .. real life's got me by the throat at the moment : (

Just my two cents worth .. I'm happy with the purchase after reading all the post about the game.

 

[Commissar Piotr]

Good Day Gentlemen

Everything I have played from it so far, a bit more than half of them have been very much to my liking and came down quite close so no major balance issues. Also fun with some fortification fighting and huge russian assaults. Gives a very good "feel" of the operation as far as I can tell (but what do I know).

 

[Jack Dionne]

Yes but how is the actual campaign game? Has anybody completed one yet?

 

[Commissar Piotr]

Evening Gentlemen

Check out this if you want something on the CG:
http://www.warfarehq.com/index.php?page=after_action_reports/aar.shtml#ASL

 

[Capt Harlock]

Hi,

Thanks Rogneholt for the link, I have played Hoffmiesters Charge and thought it might be a bit tough on Jerry. The Russian air support is very dreadful indeed on Jerry trying to slog his way through to victory. I remember how devastating the residual FP left behind by a strafing FB played havoc with my troop movement.

BTW, why the personal attack against another ASL player in your sig? Just curious so as to be careful what I post. I also have no desire to anger the forum regulars.

Mitch

 

[Commissar Piotr]

Evening Gentlemen

I have not played Hoffmeisters myself, but all packs usually got something with issues and it might seem better balanced next time you play.

 

[da priest]

...BTW, why the personal attack against another ASL player in your sig? ...

The truth is not a personal attack. Long history behind that very valid statement.:bandit:

 

[graydo]

The truth is not a personal attack.

Actually it can be.

dave

 

[Reepicheep]

Let's just leave it here and say there is more to Mitch than meets the eye. As you might have guessed, he isn't from the UK and Mitch... well, I think you might know his actual name and why he was showing an innocent interest in querying Peter's sig.

 

[Jay White]

I don't think this forum is dead at all! In fact, this is my favorite ASL place to come to.

I think its livelier and more constructive than any other forum/mailing list I've seen since I started this hobby 4-5 years ago.

-Jay

 

[graydo]

Let's just leave it here and say there is more to Mitch than meets the eye. As you might have guessed, he isn't from the UK and Mitch... well, I think you might know his actual name and why he was showing an innocent interest in querying Peter's sig.

Having said that is it still appropriate to have a sig line with a personal attack in it?

dave

 

[Loquitor]

Hmmmmmmmm and I thought ol Fizz may have been another form of Scott

 

[Legion]

Having said that is it still appropriate to have a sig line with a personal attack in it?

Yea, i gotta 'Roger That'; doesn't actually fit the feel of the ASL forum, better off for the free-fire zone

 

[Reepicheep]

Good points, gentlemen. And since this thread is (predictably) moving away from a discussion of Onslaugh to Orsha, let's call it quits here. If anyone wants to talk about Onslaught to Orsha, another thread is probably the best place to do so.