rreinesch
Elder Member
- OtO2 Russian Vehicle Notes 15 and 16: In the RF notes, it says M2A2(a) and M2A2(L)(a) whereas it should say M4A2(a) and M4A2(L)(a).
- Russian captured German MMG and HMG dm counters would have a B11 on the counters.
Yup! Working with that counting stuff with my granddaughter as well.?There are two Hex Y27s. The woods one should be Y26. This will appear only on both map 2.
Yes, it should. Thanks for the catch.In the Russian Ordnance Listing Table, should the Notes column for the 152mm GP obr. 37 be "4,A,C" instead of "2,A,C"?
Yes. It should be on the hex to take out the building.OtO-14 sparse orchard overlays, should AA5 be AA6?
Yes.In the Leader Generation Table on page BFP-18 there is a line for a DR of 12 and for >=12. Should it just be > 12 on the last line?
I'll check my notes and see about the RE. You are correct on the <= 2.In SASL Mission OtO-S1, in the MINEFIELDS section: In the EXC it says "on a subsequent dr of = 2 AT minefield factors are present in addition to the AP mines". Is <=2 meant? Also in the ENEMY RE event 13-16 there are some symbols missing, I think.
The back of the counter and listing for the KV-8S is in error. It should have APCR #s of A4(3)/5(4)/6(5)Russian vehicle note 13. KV-8S. The counter and notes indicate A4 starting in 1942, but the vehicle is not available until 1943. Should this vehicle really just have A5 starting in 1943?
Yes.Russian vehicle note 14. SU-76M, vehicle listing: The MA is listed as "T76L" vice "B76L"
YesRussian vehicle note 21. SU-57(a), vehicle listing: The MA is listed as "T57L" vice "B57L"
YesRussian vehicle note 15/16. end of 4th line - "shipped to Russian," should most likely be "shipped to Russia,"
Go with the OtO2 information for those vehicles where you see a difference from earlier. We have done a lot of work to investigate the vehicles presented in OtO with new source materials gained over just the last few years. And in some cases, yes, past assumptions required revisions based on new understandings.Russian vehicle note 19 (Valentine IX) and Crucible of Steel, Russian note 5, vehicle listings: The Cos listing has availability dates for this tank as 6/42-45 and the OtO2 vehicle listing has it as 43-45. RF in OTO2 stated 1.4 from 43-44 and 1.5 in 45, CoS is listed as just 1.4 for the entire span. OTO2 includes APDS as D4 J4+, whereas the CoS counter does not include any APDS. Is the OTO2 information just updated or are they supposed to be 2 different versions of the vehicle?
Yes.Russian vehicle note 23, 5th dagger regarding 4 TK rolls "when using attacking using the AP" should probably be 'when attacking using the AP"
Yes.Russian vehicle note 23 vehicle listing: Notes US V and US AA have dagger superscript 1, but no corresponding superscript 1 dagger is on the line, it appears the superscript 1 is missing from the MA dagger;
The only one that would potentially affect play would be the KV-8S depletion numbers, the rest are just trivial typos to fix for your next print run.All great catches. Thanks. Now I get to go get flogged for missing these in the first place. (Damnit!)
We'll get some replacement counters out for that with the next counter print run that we need to do for a product.The only one that would potentially affect play would be the KV-8S depletion numbers, the rest are just trivial typos to fix for your next print run.
Will that be the BFP Deluxe Pack Rick? ?We'll get some replacement counters out for that with the next counter print run that we need to do for a product.
Uber sized.Will that be the BFP Deluxe Pack Rick? ?