Onslaught to Orsha 2 Errata

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
  1. OtO2 Russian Vehicle Notes 15 and 16: In the RF notes, it says M2A2(a) and M2A2(L)(a) whereas it should say M4A2(a) and M4A2(L)(a).
  2. Russian captured German MMG and HMG dm counters would have a B11 on the counters.
I'll give it a little time before issuing sticky errata and notes until we're sure things have settled after a while. But so far it's looking good if this is it for now.
 

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
New piece of errata. Hex D19 was mislabeled as D10. This will appear on both map 1 and map 2.
 

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
There are two Hex Y27s. The woods one should be Y26. This will appear only on both map 2.
 

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
A couple of minor erratas
1. On page BFP 21 or the OtO 2 HASL rules, FOOTNOTE (20), sixth line: replace “and” with “a”.

2. On page BFP 21 or the OtO 2 HASL rules, FOOTNOTE (20), fifteenth line: delete the “.” before “e”.
 

CrosleyPup

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Messages
43
Reaction score
34
Location
Chicago
Country
llUnited States
In the Russian Ordnance Listing Table, should the Notes column for the 152mm GP obr. 37 be "4,A,C" instead of "2,A,C"?
 

CrosleyPup

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2011
Messages
43
Reaction score
34
Location
Chicago
Country
llUnited States
In the Leader Generation Table on page BFP-18 there is a line for a DR of 12 and for >=12. Should it just be > 12 on the last line?
 

oybj

Recruit
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
25
Reaction score
17
Country
llNorway
In SASL Mission OtO-S1, in the MINEFIELDS section: In the EXC it says "on a subsequent dr of = 2 AT minefield factors are present in addition to the AP mines". Is <=2 meant? Also in the ENEMY RE event 13-16 there are some symbols missing, I think.
 

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
In SASL Mission OtO-S1, in the MINEFIELDS section: In the EXC it says "on a subsequent dr of = 2 AT minefield factors are present in addition to the AP mines". Is <=2 meant? Also in the ENEMY RE event 13-16 there are some symbols missing, I think.
I'll check my notes and see about the RE. You are correct on the <= 2.

Edit: You are correct about the RE. Text should be "dr of < 2 = 6; dr of 3 4 = 8; dr of > 5 = 12"
 
Last edited:

apbills

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
2,526
Reaction score
129
Location
Pewaukee, WI
Country
llUnited States
Russian vehicle note 13. KV-8S. The counter and notes indicate A4 starting in 1942, but the vehicle is not available until 1943. Should this vehicle really just have A5 starting in 1943?

Russian vehicle note 14. SU-76M, vehicle listing: The MA is listed as "T76L" vice "B76L"
Russian vehicle note 21. SU-57(a), vehicle listing: The MA is listed as "T57L" vice "B57L"

Russian vehicle note 15/16. end of 4th line - "shipped to Russian," should most likely be "shipped to Russia,"

Russian vehicle note 19 (Valentine IX) and Crucible of Steel, Russian note 5, vehicle listings: The Cos listing has availability dates for this tank as 6/42-45 and the OtO2 vehicle listing has it as 43-45. RF in OTO2 stated 1.4 from 43-44 and 1.5 in 45, CoS is listed as just 1.4 for the entire span. OTO2 includes APDS as D4 J4+, whereas the CoS counter does not include any APDS. Is the OTO2 information just updated or are they supposed to be 2 different versions of the vehicle?

Russian vehicle note 23, 3rd dagger regarding 4 TK rolls "when using attacking using the AP" should probably be 'when attacking using the AP"

Russian vehicle note 23 vehicle listing: Notes US V and US AA have dagger superscript 1, but no corresponding superscript 1 dagger is on the line, it appears the superscript 1 is missing from the MA dagger;
 
Last edited:

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
Russian vehicle note 13. KV-8S. The counter and notes indicate A4 starting in 1942, but the vehicle is not available until 1943. Should this vehicle really just have A5 starting in 1943?
The back of the counter and listing for the KV-8S is in error. It should have APCR #s of A4(3)/5(4)/6(5)

Russian vehicle note 14. SU-76M, vehicle listing: The MA is listed as "T76L" vice "B76L"
Yes.

Russian vehicle note 21. SU-57(a), vehicle listing: The MA is listed as "T57L" vice "B57L"
Yes

Russian vehicle note 15/16. end of 4th line - "shipped to Russian," should most likely be "shipped to Russia,"
Yes

Russian vehicle note 19 (Valentine IX) and Crucible of Steel, Russian note 5, vehicle listings: The Cos listing has availability dates for this tank as 6/42-45 and the OtO2 vehicle listing has it as 43-45. RF in OTO2 stated 1.4 from 43-44 and 1.5 in 45, CoS is listed as just 1.4 for the entire span. OTO2 includes APDS as D4 J4+, whereas the CoS counter does not include any APDS. Is the OTO2 information just updated or are they supposed to be 2 different versions of the vehicle?
Go with the OtO2 information for those vehicles where you see a difference from earlier. We have done a lot of work to investigate the vehicles presented in OtO with new source materials gained over just the last few years. And in some cases, yes, past assumptions required revisions based on new understandings.

Russian vehicle note 23, 5th dagger regarding 4 TK rolls "when using attacking using the AP" should probably be 'when attacking using the AP"
Yes.

Russian vehicle note 23 vehicle listing: Notes US V and US AA have dagger superscript 1, but no corresponding superscript 1 dagger is on the line, it appears the superscript 1 is missing from the MA dagger;
Yes.

All great catches. Thanks. Now I get to go get flogged for missing these in the first place. (Damnit!)
 
Last edited:

apbills

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
2,526
Reaction score
129
Location
Pewaukee, WI
Country
llUnited States
All great catches. Thanks. Now I get to go get flogged for missing these in the first place. (Damnit!)
The only one that would potentially affect play would be the KV-8S depletion numbers, the rest are just trivial typos to fix for your next print run.
 

rreinesch

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
1,598
Reaction score
1,139
Location
Austin, TX
Country
llUnited States
The only one that would potentially affect play would be the KV-8S depletion numbers, the rest are just trivial typos to fix for your next print run.
We'll get some replacement counters out for that with the next counter print run that we need to do for a product.
 
Top