New German FlaK guns for the game ??

Vinnie

See Dummies in the index
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
17,445
Reaction score
3,391
Location
Aberdeen , Scotland
Country
llUnited Kingdom
What are they?
As it us, they look very "anti aircraft" and not up to much on the ground role.
 

A_T_Great

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
808
Reaction score
580
Location
Maine
Country
llUnited States
What are they 37MM? they would be cool counters to have...
 

Michael Dorosh

der Spieß des Forums
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
15,733
Reaction score
2,765
Location
Calgary, AB
First name
Michael
Country
llCanada
Critical Hit is including these with their DKM Graf Zeppelin counter set - the map of Stettin is amazing.

15405
 

jtsjc1

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
491
Reaction score
203
Location
nj
Country
llUnited States
Wow what's the IFT equivalent for that!
 

Actionjick

Forum Guru
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
7,581
Reaction score
5,079
Location
Kent, Ohio
First name
Darryl
Country
llUnited States
Graf Zeppelin, battleships, super guns, monster tanks. Wtf. Talk about being insecure about your masculinity.

What good is one aircraft carrier anyway? Just a big target.???
Battle of the Philippine Sea, aka the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot. 15 U.S. carriers and 9 Japanese carriers. That's two carrier forces worth talking about.
 

Michael Dorosh

der Spieß des Forums
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
15,733
Reaction score
2,765
Location
Calgary, AB
First name
Michael
Country
llCanada
Graf Zeppelin, battleships, super guns, monster tanks. Wtf. Talk about being insecure about your masculinity.

What good is one aircraft carrier anyway? Just a big target.???
The Allies never did hit it, though. The hull stayed camouflaged in one of the river channels near Stettin til late in the war when she was scuttled.

The arms race that Germany began circa 1908 (?) with the British - and helped ignite the First World War - was brought about by German desires to have a deep water navy able to compete with the RN and support an overseas empire. Black Adder described the German Empire as a "sausage factory in Tanganyika" which was probably not far off the mark....

I suppose some of those attitudes may have hung around.
 

Michael Dorosh

der Spieß des Forums
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
15,733
Reaction score
2,765
Location
Calgary, AB
First name
Michael
Country
llCanada
15406

I expect the Graf would have mounted some kind of anti-aircraft guns in the mounts visible at flight deck level. Would be an interesting "what if" scenario to have a Russian force attacking a fully-equipped aircraft carrier moored in the Oder. Though in actuality it was just an empty hull.
 

Actionjick

Forum Guru
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
7,581
Reaction score
5,079
Location
Kent, Ohio
First name
Darryl
Country
llUnited States
View attachment 15406

I expect the Graf would have mounted some kind of anti-aircraft guns in the mounts visible at flight deck level. Would be an interesting "what if" scenario to have a Russian force attacking a fully-equipped aircraft carrier moored in the Oder. Though in actuality it was just an empty hull.
How many submarines could they have built with the resources that went into building this thing? Enough to close the North Atlantic?
 

Actionjick

Forum Guru
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
7,581
Reaction score
5,079
Location
Kent, Ohio
First name
Darryl
Country
llUnited States
Enough to kill a few hundred more submariners you mean.....
I divided the displacement of the Graf Zeppelin, 33,500 tons, by displacement of the type VII U boat, 757 tons which I rounded up to 760, and came up with a ballpark figure of 44. I have no idea if this is how you would determine how many submarines could have been built instead. Interesting to speculate on though. Would 44 extra U boats been enough to make a strategic difference? Another area of interesting speculation.
 

von Marwitz

Forum Guru
Joined
Nov 25, 2010
Messages
14,376
Reaction score
10,269
Location
Kraut Corner
Country
llUkraine
I divided the displacement of the Graf Zeppelin, 33,500 tons, by displacement of the type VII U boat, 757 tons which I rounded up to 760, and came up with a ballpark figure of 44. I have no idea if this is how you would determine how many submarines could have been built instead. Interesting to speculate on though. Would 44 extra U boats been enough to make a strategic difference? Another area of interesting speculation.
Early in the war, 44 extra operational Type VII U-boats would have made the hell of a difference.

At the beginning of WW2, the Germans had 57 U-boats, of which 39 were suited for use in the Atlantic. About one third of the total would usually be on station (and one third moving to/from the area of operations, the last third being in port). So only around 20 U-boats were on station around Great Britain. With 44 extra Type VII boats, this would have been 75% more boats of the most useful type.

The Allies sorely lacked escorts at the time and had not settled into an effective convoy-system yet. Allied detection techniques (radar in particular) yet needed to be improved to become more effective.

Maybe most importantly, the Allies had neither captured nor decrypted the Enigma-machines and code early in the war, which allowed them since 1941 to know exactly where the boats were moving to.

For these reasons, German U-boats were much more effective at the beginning of the war as a weapon. Especially, when in 1940 the French ports were available as bases for sorties directly into the Atlantic.

Just take the time to look at the sunken tonnage by some German subs early in the war and compare it to the numbers by US subs in the Pacific (which were long plagued, admittedly, by awful torpedoes). The Germans had their torpedo issues, too, early in the war, but they were fixed much quicker than those of the US. In effect, the Japanese had the best torpedoes in WW2.

von Marwitz
 

Actionjick

Forum Guru
Joined
Apr 23, 2020
Messages
7,581
Reaction score
5,079
Location
Kent, Ohio
First name
Darryl
Country
llUnited States
Early in the war, 44 extra operational Type VII U-boats would have made the hell of a difference.

At the beginning of WW2, the Germans had 57 U-boats, of which 39 were suited for use in the Atlantic. About one third of the total would usually be on station (and one third moving to/from the area of operations, the last third being in port). So only around 20 U-boats were on station around Great Britain. With 44 extra Type VII boats, this would have been 75% more boats of the most useful type.

The Allies sorely lacked escorts at the time and had not settled into an effective convoy-system yet. Allied detection techniques (radar in particular) yet needed to be improved to become more effective.

Maybe most importantly, the Allies had neither captured nor decrypted the Enigma-machines and code early in the war, which allowed them since 1941 to know exactly where the boats were moving to.

For these reasons, German U-boats were much more effective at the beginning of the war as a weapon. Especially, when in 1940 the French ports were available as bases for sorties directly into the Atlantic.

Just take the time to look at the sunken tonnage by some German subs early in the war and compare it to the numbers by US subs in the Pacific (which were long plagued, admittedly, by awful torpedoes). The Germans had their torpedo issues, too, early in the war, but they were fixed much quicker than those of the US. In effect, the Japanese had the best torpedoes in WW2.

von Marwitz
German submarine losses were horrific, about 785 boats out of about 1160. The U.S lost 52 boats in the Pacific. While U.S. torpedoes were notoriously unreliable at the beginning of the war U.S. submarines played a major role in crippling the Japanese merchant fleet.

The Japanese Long Lance torpedo was an excellent weapon.

Interesting stuff but straying way off topic. Still interested in the AA guns.
 
Top