Honza
The Art Of Wargames
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 13,920
- Reaction score
- 2,672
- Location
- Oxfordshire
- First name
- Jan
- Country
-
Hello MMP,
I have a query regarding a napalm ATT attack vs the CA of a pillbox.
Chpt. B30.113 states that Aerial attacks add the NCA TEM of the pillbox to the resolution of their attack.
Chpt. G17.41 states that a HIT by napalm is treated as an attack by a 24FP flamethrower except as stated otherwise. It then goes on to list how a napalm attack differs from a normal FT attack.
Since the Chpt. G rule is later on in the rulebook does it override the Chpt. B rule? Normally a FT attacking a pillbox through the CA would not add the TEM to the resolution. And the Chpt. G rule states that napalm is resolved as a FT attack. But the earlier Chpt. B rule states that Aerial attacks add the NCA TEM of the pillbox.
So the question is does an ATT attack with napalm vs the CA of a pillbox add the NCA TEM to the effects DR?
Answer by Perry - Yes it does.
I have a query regarding a napalm ATT attack vs the CA of a pillbox.
Chpt. B30.113 states that Aerial attacks add the NCA TEM of the pillbox to the resolution of their attack.
Chpt. G17.41 states that a HIT by napalm is treated as an attack by a 24FP flamethrower except as stated otherwise. It then goes on to list how a napalm attack differs from a normal FT attack.
Since the Chpt. G rule is later on in the rulebook does it override the Chpt. B rule? Normally a FT attacking a pillbox through the CA would not add the TEM to the resolution. And the Chpt. G rule states that napalm is resolved as a FT attack. But the earlier Chpt. B rule states that Aerial attacks add the NCA TEM of the pillbox.
So the question is does an ATT attack with napalm vs the CA of a pillbox add the NCA TEM to the effects DR?
Answer by Perry - Yes it does.