It wasn't that bad, although you were obviously getting somewhat worked up over it
But I understood that a close friend of you saw Sept. 11 from very, very close. That explains the emotion related to all this, and it's understandable. But I know you probably also agree that emotions do not replace sound and cold judgement and analysis when deciding upon the correct course of action i.e. terrorism, Iraq and so on.
People who have a harder time understanding how the Iraqi invasion is part of the global fight against terrorism (like me) aren't any less concerned with terrorism, they are just concerned about the long term consequences of this invasion and its fallout: will it really decrease the threat of terrorism, or could it, by fanning the flames of the fanatical, be increasing it instead ? Are we living in a safer world now than before April 9, 2003, when Bagdad fell? I think the question is worth asking and analyzing.
In any case, we saw much more worse threads when Marko used to be here