Robin said:
I may be wrong, but a vehicular MA MG, when not firing as ordnance, fires on the IFT as a Vehicular MG, and not exactly "IFE" : its ROF is not lowered by one as a Gun's IFE would demand...
D'oh!
No wonder Mr. Blackcloud6 was not impressed with my arguments, especially when I make, well, stupid remarks like that.
Everything I stated in this thread about "IFE" was irrelevant with regards to MA MG!
Geez, what the heck was up with that!?!
I'm not sure what the problem was. It was one part being too hasty to make my point, and one part posting these in the middle of the night after feeding my daughter. Or first thing in the morning before my coffee...
Let's see ... it's 2:00 AM ... the baby wakes up ... take ten minutes to feed the baby ... take twenty minutes to read the Forums and make a post ... seems about right to me.
Robin said:
It seems to me that Vehicular MGs are not included - they are not "Guns", even if they may fire as "ordnance"...
In this case, a MA MG still fits the definition of "Gun", being a weapon on a 5/8" currently firing as ordnance. So when firing as ordnance, an MA MG is considered a Gun, but when firing as non-ordnance it's considered a CMG (or AAMG or whatever MG).
But yikes, my apologies to Blackcloud6. While I remain convinced that he is wrong with regards to A9.61, I can see a little more clearly where the confusion could have come from. I can also see why he was not impressed much with my reasoning...
Regards,
Bruce Bakken