BarcelonaBlom
Member
General Opinions. (no pun intended) about this "military" movie.
Great idea!Originally posted by Janos
I think the books and movies were great. It was a great idea on the director's part to film all 3 parts together, so all the actors would be available and would look the same (and wouldn't demand ridiculous salaries because part 1 was a hit).
Now we need to do a modern version of The Hobbit. I'll love see modern-day technology do Smaug destroying the city on the lake!
JS
You got a problem with boobs?:laugh:Originally posted by Overseer
I'm agree with Lance on most points except the Arwen vs. Glorfindel point. I don't think that streamlined the story any. I think that was done just to put some boobs in at a point where there otherwise wouldn't have been any until the second movie.
And besides, Glorfindel was awesome, he was one of the few in Middle Earth that could openly ride against the nine and survive!
Also last I heard about a Hobbit movie: Peter Jackson wants to make it, but the rights are actually owned by someone different and there were supposedly issues involved in getting the rights. Tolkien's son or grandson (whoever it is that's alive right now) says he would love to have Jackson make it, but they have to figure out and get through all the red tape first.
The extended versions on DVD, with a great home theater are definately the way to go!!Originally posted by Wolfe Tone
Great idea!
I did like the books better than the films though.
However that being said I never expected the films to be better anyway.
Under the circumstances it was going be impossible for Peter Jackson to please everybody with a cinematic version of LOTR.
I enjoyed the The Fellowship Of The Ring the best. I was prepared for a flop and well pleased with that that was not the case.
The Two Towers was good but did not live up to the first one, Gollum saved the day though!
The Return Of The King was very good, probably because the epic battle scenes carried it through.
I would like to see them all again though, away from the claustrophobic atmosphere of a Cinema. Then I might appreciate things I missed the first time round.
And there will be the chance to see yet more of the lovely Liv!
:demon:
It's on his plate. Right after King Kong.Originally posted by Janos
I think the books and movies were great. It was a great idea on the director's part to film all 3 parts together, so all the actors would be available and would look the same (and wouldn't demand ridiculous salaries because part 1 was a hit).
Now we need to do a modern version of The Hobbit. I'll love see modern-day technology do Smaug destroying the city on the lake!
JS
They're remaking King Kong? Again! I hope they don't screw it up, like they back in '76. The original is one of the great monster classics.Originally posted by RichardS
It's on his plate. Right after King Kong.
Cheers!
:toast:
:armed:
Yup; Peter Jackson is doing King Kong once again.Originally posted by GeorgiaDixie
They're remaking King Kong? Again! I hope they don't screw it up, like they back in '76. The original is one of the great monster classics.
*I* like Harry Potter movies. Haven't seen Prisoner of Azkaban yet. Also didn't vote for it. But I felt compelled to say I do like the Harry Potter books and movies.Originally posted by BarcelonaBlom
What EVIL EVIL EVIL demon: :demon: :demon: ) person said Harry Potter is better. They're a which BURN THEM! BURN THEM!!!!